“…Over the past few years there have been various applications of SVM in hydrologic science [Dibike et al, 2001;See and Abrahart, 2001;Liong and Sivapragasam, 2002;Asefa and Kemblowski, 2002;Gill et al, 2003Gill et al, , 2006Asefa et al, 2004;Khalil, 2005;Khalil et al, 2005aKhalil et al, , 2005bKhalil et al, , 2005cKhalil et al, , 2006Asefa et al, 2005]. It is a far more robust machine than ANNs [Khalil, 2005;Khalil et al, 2005a], and it has been seen to reduce the dimensionality of the calibration procedure considerably as compared to a physical/conceptual model, e.g., Sacramento soil moisture accounting (SACSMA) model. There are three SVM parameters that must be determined through calibration: trade-off C, tolerance e, and kernel parameter g. The model tested here is the same as the one already used in a previous study for soil moisture prediction [Khalil et al, 2005b].…”