2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.05.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applicability of the strain accumulation procedure for the geotechnical foundation design of zero-radius bend triggers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cyclic stresses in the uniform cyclic tests -symmetrical and nonsymmetrical with CSR = 1 -were selected such that there would be sufficient data to fit strain contours in the respective contour diagrams. Non-symmetrical tests with uniform amplitudes and τave > τcyc were also conducted, and in particular with CSR = 0.26 and 0.42, with shear stresses representative of the loading conditions of a subsea zero-radius bend trigger during pipe-laying (Peek & Kristiansen 2009, Zografou et al 2018. The cyclic shear stresses in the staged tests, with the exception of one test [StCs1], were chosen so that failure would not occur in any of the parcels, allowing the effect of cyclic stress history to be investigated.…”
Section: Testing Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cyclic stresses in the uniform cyclic tests -symmetrical and nonsymmetrical with CSR = 1 -were selected such that there would be sufficient data to fit strain contours in the respective contour diagrams. Non-symmetrical tests with uniform amplitudes and τave > τcyc were also conducted, and in particular with CSR = 0.26 and 0.42, with shear stresses representative of the loading conditions of a subsea zero-radius bend trigger during pipe-laying (Peek & Kristiansen 2009, Zografou et al 2018. The cyclic shear stresses in the staged tests, with the exception of one test [StCs1], were chosen so that failure would not occur in any of the parcels, allowing the effect of cyclic stress history to be investigated.…”
Section: Testing Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dataset of contour diagrams developed in this study provides a useful tool for the interpretation of model test data, as kaolin is a material used extensively for research and a large existing dataset of physical modelling results involving cyclic loading on kaolin is available in the public domain (e.g. Clukey et al 1995, Chen & Randolph 2007, Acosta-Martinez & Gourvenec 2008, Zografou et al 2018.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The normalised shear stress and number of cycles at failure are also plotted on the contour diagram on Figure 10 for the centrifuge test with low-level cyclic loading followed by a consolidation period and a parcel of cyclic loading of high magnitude [LOW_CONS_HIGH] (q V,max/qV,ult = -0.95 and N = 41). It is noted that the first parcel with qV,max/qV,ult = -0.36 (-0.10 ± 0.30) and N = 1080 plots near the horizontal contour of 1% and is not considered in the accumulation procedure (Zografou et al 2018a, Zografou et al 2018b. As shown in Figure 9 and discussed above, T-bar tests through the foundation footprint in the cyclic test with the same sequence until the end of consolidation period [LOW_CONS indicated that the increase in s u is between 20%, close to the centre of the foundation and up to 70% close to the edges of the foundation.…”
Section: Failure Criteria On a Shear Strain Contour Diagrammentioning
confidence: 99%