2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Applicability of Willems methods and Demirjian’s four teeth method for dental age estimation: Cross sectional study on Tunisian sub-adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
9
1
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
9
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The radiographic evaluation of teeth mineralization and assessment of tooth eruption are the two main methods of CA estimation [4,5]. As the eruption of permanent teeth (PT) is easily affected by environmental factors, such as eating habits, nutrition status, local trauma, and persistence of deciduous teeth [3,6,7], recent studies of CA estimation based on radiographically observed that teeth mineralization has wider application in both forensic medicine and clinical oral medicine [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radiographic evaluation of teeth mineralization and assessment of tooth eruption are the two main methods of CA estimation [4,5]. As the eruption of permanent teeth (PT) is easily affected by environmental factors, such as eating habits, nutrition status, local trauma, and persistence of deciduous teeth [3,6,7], recent studies of CA estimation based on radiographically observed that teeth mineralization has wider application in both forensic medicine and clinical oral medicine [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…overestimation of chronological age was validated in a variety of counties or regions such as India [ 33 ],Turkey [ 34 ], Thailand [ 35 ], Spain [ 36 ],Kenya [ 37 ] and Poland [ 38 ]. Elsewhere, there were also reports of underestimation in north China [ 24 ], Tunisia [ 30 ], and Sri Lanka [ 39 ]. In allusion to the differences of the Willems I method among several regions, a systemic review, and meta-analysis we conducted previously concerning the Willems I method revealed the Willems method overestimated CA by 0.18 years and 0.06 years for boys and girls, respectively [ 4 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Underestimations by Willems method was seen in some non-Indian populations [22,23,27,28,31,33] whereas a few more overestimated CA [12,14,[34][35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%