2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-12958-7_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application and Requirement of DIgSILENT PowerFactory to MATLAB/Simulink Interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, the P/f control strategy is selected as the f control. Also, the variation of generators speed across the two areas is defined as the input signal of the WMFOPID controller 28,30 . Based on the LPF position in the power system, the signal transmission delay among PMU, PDC, and WMFOPID controller should be defined as a constant time delay, T m .…”
Section: Test Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the P/f control strategy is selected as the f control. Also, the variation of generators speed across the two areas is defined as the input signal of the WMFOPID controller 28,30 . Based on the LPF position in the power system, the signal transmission delay among PMU, PDC, and WMFOPID controller should be defined as a constant time delay, T m .…”
Section: Test Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the proposed controller is placed at the LPF, the signal transmission delay between PMUs and PID controller should be considered as a constant time delay, where T m equals to 100 milliseconds is defined for controller design . The frequency difference of two areas is considered as the PID controller input signal …”
Section: Test System and Optimal Pid Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, this method cannot be implemented here. In the present study, the frequency difference of two areas is considered to be the OPOD input signal [26,29]. In the next step, the K OPOD ,T 1 , T 2 ,T 3 , and T 4 are determined.…”
Section: Opod Designmentioning
confidence: 99%