2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.poetic.2022.101706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application essays and the ritual production of merit in US selective admissions

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At first glance, this suggests that among applicants there are narrative materials that are broadly shared, regardless of intended major. In the aggregate, these results are similar in a qualitative study of first year essays which also found some parity in narrative choices [ 15 ]. The full table of codes is available in Table S7.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At first glance, this suggests that among applicants there are narrative materials that are broadly shared, regardless of intended major. In the aggregate, these results are similar in a qualitative study of first year essays which also found some parity in narrative choices [ 15 ]. The full table of codes is available in Table S7.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Previous work studying admissions essays has been mostly descriptive and correlational. For example, studies using both computational and qualitative methods have found that applicant gender, income, college GPA, and thematic choices have all been found to be correlated with admissions essays [ 4 , 5 , 15 , 16 ]. Another study found that word vectors trained on essays written by applicants in the highest income quartile performed better on the Google Analogy Test Set and various word similarity tests than essays written by the two lowest income quartiles [ 17 ].…”
Section: Admissions Essays and Beyond: Computational Methods And Syst...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applicants used to write two essays responding to the same two prompts, but starting in 2016-2017 applicants had to write four essays in response to eight prompts. Though there is slight patterning of prompt selection by socioeconomic level (Gebre-Medhin et al, 2022;, we focus instead on the complete text of the essays provided by the applicants and follow (Alvero et al, 2021) in merging them. This approach enabled us to maximize the data and get stronger computational results in our text analysis.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As tokens in engineering, women resist being seen as different from men and therefore less acceptable as an engineer (Faulkner 2009; Yoder 1994). The high-stakes admissions context of our study, on the other hand, ostensibly rewards “standing out,” especially when applicants advance narratives of hardship, challenge, or experiences as marginalized or minoritized individuals (Gebre-Medhin et al 2022; Silva 2013; Waller-Bey 2020). Women seeking limited spots to enter a gender-transgressive environment are thus faced with a conundrum of tokenism: how do they demonstrate worthiness as prospective engineers, irrespective of gender, while simultaneously showcasing their distinguishing experiences as women breaking gendered boundaries?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, because personal essays resist quantification and commensuration, there is no standard by which to assess whether one’s essay will be more highly valued than another’s (Espeland and Stevens 1998). In other words, the subjective nature of personal essay writing means that applicants do not know which narratives might be deemed meritorious (Gebre-Medhin et al 2022), creating conditions with high evaluative uncertainty. These conditions are further heightened by the fact that applicants do not know who will be evaluating their application (Aukerman and Beach 2018).…”
Section: Gender and Narrative Self-presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%