2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.02.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of 14C analyses to source apportionment of carbonaceous PM2.5 in the UK

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
71
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
7
71
4
Order By: Relevance
“…As the majority of the currently combusted firewood was growing during the period of the 14 C-bomb peak caused by the nuclear weapon tests (between 1960-1990) (Currie et al 1989), the aerosol particles containing carbon from wood combustion have a 14 C activity slightly higher than that of the present atmosphere. According to Heal et al (2011), the 14 C level of atmospheric carbonaceoius aerosol is on average 1.08 times (weighted average of 1.05 and 1.15 after Szidat et al 2006Szidat et al , 2009 as high as that before the bomb effect, which was taken into correction. The fraction of the contemporary carbon (f C ) in the atmospheric aerosol samples can be calculated from the fraction modern values corrected for the bomb effect using the following formula:…”
Section: Radiocarbon Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the majority of the currently combusted firewood was growing during the period of the 14 C-bomb peak caused by the nuclear weapon tests (between 1960-1990) (Currie et al 1989), the aerosol particles containing carbon from wood combustion have a 14 C activity slightly higher than that of the present atmosphere. According to Heal et al (2011), the 14 C level of atmospheric carbonaceoius aerosol is on average 1.08 times (weighted average of 1.05 and 1.15 after Szidat et al 2006Szidat et al , 2009 as high as that before the bomb effect, which was taken into correction. The fraction of the contemporary carbon (f C ) in the atmospheric aerosol samples can be calculated from the fraction modern values corrected for the bomb effect using the following formula:…”
Section: Radiocarbon Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mole fraction of the fossil CO 2 excess was calculated for the monitoring period in Debrecen air (Molnár et al 2010b) based on the formula described by Levin et al (2003): can be calculated from the fraction modern values corrected for the bomb-effect using the following formula (Levin and Hesshaimer, 2000;Heal et al, 2011):…”
Section: Radiocarbon Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbonaceous aerosol particles derived from fossil fuel have f M = 0. As suggested by Heal et al (2011), a correction factor of 1.08 was used in this study. The value 1.08 was chosen as being within the range 1.04 (recent-grown crops and biogenic volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emissions) and 1.16 (tree wood 30-50 years-old), based on the expectation that the majority of non-fossil carbon in these samples is derived from truly contemporary sources rather that from 50 years-old biomass.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, a correction factor of 1.08 was chosen. 45 The f c values in the samples were defined as f c = f m /1.08, and the fraction of fossil (f f ) was defined as f f = 1 − f c . Eight summer (July 7 to August 24) samples, 13 autumn (September 1 to November 25) samples, 8 winter samples (January 1 to February 24), and 3 spring samples (March 1 to March 21) were collected to determine the 14 C in the WINSOC and the EC.…”
Section: −3mentioning
confidence: 99%