Application of a collaborative modelling and strategic fuzzy decision support system for selecting appropriate resilience strategies for seaport operations

John, Andrew; Yang, Zaili; Riahi, Ramin; Wang, Jin

doi:10.1016/s2095-7564(15)30101-x

Cited by 22 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Toosi and Kohanali (2011) assessing service quality of Iranian airlines; results show that the important criteria are comfort flight safety, knowledgeable employees to answer customer questions, without delay flights, convenient air-condition of plane and announcing schedule flights rapidly and availability of flight options to cancel or delay cases. John et al (2014) integrated fuzzy TOPSIS and Fuzzy-AHP for selection an appropriate model for evaluation of performance efficiency in seaports, finding of this study demonstrated that increasing reliability is the best investment strategy in seaports. Yeo et al (2013) combined Fuzzy-AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS for assessment of competitiveness of the aerotropolises in East Asia with FMCDM, outcomes of this paper showed that, two important criteria are basic infrastructure and convenience operation.…”

Section: Distribution Based On Integrated Ahp Topsis and Fuzzy Setmentioning

confidence: 87%

Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Techniques in Transportation Systems: A Systematic Review of the State of the Art Literature

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The main goal of this review paper is to provide a systematic review of Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques in regard to transportation systems problems. This study reviewed a total of 89 papers, published from 1993 to 2015, from 39 high-ranking journals; most of which were related to transportation science and were extracted from the Web of Science and Scopus databases. Papers were classified into 10 main application areas and nine transport infrastructure. Furthermore, papers were categorized based on the author(s) and year, name of the journal in which they were published, technique and approach, author(s) nationality, application area and scope, study purpose, gap and research problem and results and outcome. The results of this study indicated that more papers on MCDM in 2013 than in any other year. AHP and Fuzzy-AHP methods in the individual methods and hybrid MCDM and fuzzy MCDM in the integrated methods were ranked as the first and second methods in use, respectively. The Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice was the most significant journal in this study, with 13 publications on the topic. Finally, service quality was ranked as the first application area and airline industry was ranked as the first transport infrastructure that applied MCDM techniques.

show abstract

Section: Distribution Based On Integrated Ahp Topsis and Fuzzy Setmentioning

confidence: 87%

Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Techniques in Transportation Systems: A Systematic Review of the State of the Art Literature

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…According to Reichert et al (2007) as cited in John et al (2014), decision analysis techniques were originally developed to support individual decision makers in carefully considering all aspects of the decision making process. Nonetheless, Ananda and Herath (2003) and Marttunen and Hamalainen (1995) are of the view that because these techniques are used to structure the problem under consideration and to make clear the expectations about outcomes and preferences, they can also be used to support group decisions as well as communicating decisions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As the complexity of decisions increases in complex machineries, it becomes more challenging for decision makers to identify appropriate alternatives. As a result, robust but flexible analytical tools that can account for these difficulties are required to consider the numerous criteria and decision outcomes (John et al, 2014).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Application of a multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM) model for selecting appropriate maintenance strategy for marine and offshore machinery operations

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP) with the aim to select the appropriate resilient strategy for seaport operations [71]; 2.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Literature Review of the Concepts of Resilience and Sustainability in Group Decision-Making

Ardebili

Padoano

2020

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The most critical decisions usually involve several decision makers with different roles and opportunities to commit key resources. Several group decision-making (GDM) approaches can support the identification of a joint or compromise decision in less conflicting settings, where there is a group of subjects (e.g’, partners) who pursue a common overall objective. However, considering the uncertainty in future events and complexity of modern-day systems, decision processes do not always produce beneficial results or give the participants a positive perception of their role in the process. Group decision-making should then take into consideration some aspects that might insure future resilience and sustainability, particularly the achievement of the objectives in view of future risks and the transparency and participation that are needed to limit problems in the implementation phase of the decision. The literature survey presented in this study identified a research gap regarding GDM. Differently from traditional GDM, which was first discussed in the early 1980s and whose body of knowledge is pretty defined, resilient and sustainable GDM (R&S GDM) is fairly new. The main objective of this study is then identifying the main attributes for supporting sustainable and resilient group decisions. To this aim, a preliminary focused systematic review was conducted to study the existing group decision-making methods in the literature and how the concepts of sustainability and resilience have been employed. After defining the search keywords and exclusion criteria for the individuation of the articles, the first screening process was carried out and the most relevant articles were selected. The last steps of the systematic review were the classification of the articles and the full paper examination to extract the main factors of R&S GDM. Seven attributes were listed as the key factors of R&S GDM. In light of those factors, a group decision process concerning an injection moulding line in Tajikistan was investigated. The case study highlighted that over self-confidence, information flow and transparency were the main reasons for faulty decisions, thus suggesting that information system and information fluidity play an important role in R&S GDM. Finally, the most important managerial implications of R&S GDM are reported.

show abstract

Application of a collaborative modelling and strategic fuzzy decision support system for selecting appropriate resilience strategies for seaport operations

Cited by 22 publications

References 42 publications

Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Techniques in Transportation Systems: A Systematic Review of the State of the Art Literature

Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Techniques in Transportation Systems: A Systematic Review of the State of the Art Literature

Application of a multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM) model for selecting appropriate maintenance strategy for marine and offshore machinery operations

A Literature Review of the Concepts of Resilience and Sustainability in Group Decision-Making

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About