2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.09.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of a combined particle swarm optimization and perturb and observe method for MPPT in PV systems under partial shading conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
114
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
114
0
Order By: Relevance
“…control, Particle swarm optimization… [15]- [18] However, in the second category we find: Incremental Conductance Perturbation , Fractional Open-Circuit Voltage, and the most widely used technique is Perturb and Observe (P&O) algorithms due to its simplicity and fast response [13], [14], [19]. In addition, a comparison between conventional and intelligent MPPT techniques are investigated in [20], [21]. For more investigation, some interesting papers review nearly all known MPPT techniques and give a comparative between their advantages and disadvantages are in [22]- [24] …”
Section: Pv System With Mppt Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…control, Particle swarm optimization… [15]- [18] However, in the second category we find: Incremental Conductance Perturbation , Fractional Open-Circuit Voltage, and the most widely used technique is Perturb and Observe (P&O) algorithms due to its simplicity and fast response [13], [14], [19]. In addition, a comparison between conventional and intelligent MPPT techniques are investigated in [20], [21]. For more investigation, some interesting papers review nearly all known MPPT techniques and give a comparative between their advantages and disadvantages are in [22]- [24] …”
Section: Pv System With Mppt Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that SOA is more effective than either BFO or GA in finding the optimal transient performance [7]. Swarm intelligence with PO algorithm was proposed and analyized oscillations in the output power, voltage and current of the PV system [8]. Perturbation and observation (P&O) method was proposed to track the MPPT of PV system for getting maximum system efficiency and obtained maximum power of PV system when compare with traditional P & O [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade, several researchers have compared various MPPT techniques [9,10], focusing on the P-V characteristics [11][12][13][14][15], models [16][17][18][19], and methods [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] to track the maximum power of PV modules/arrays under partial shading conditions (PSC). The research on the PV output characteristics is mainly focused on the analysis of failure, power loss, and voltage variations in the MPPT method under the PSC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the traditional method is used to track the MPP [23][24][25][26]. The advantage of the methods in this category is that they can reduce the traversal region; however, they have a higher dependency on the analysis of the local shadow models and output characteristics, which means that the determination of the MPP region is difficult and the robustness is poor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%