2023
DOI: 10.1109/access.2023.3260253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of a Community Battery-Integrated Microgrid in a Blockchain-Based Local Energy Market Accommodating P2P Trading

Abstract: This paper presents the application of a community battery energy storage system (CBESS)integrated microgrid (MG) in a blockchain-enabled local energy market (LEM). The proposed LEM balances the community energy requirement while facilitating frequent peer-to-peer (P2P) energy transactions between several energy users in the presence of both energy supplier and energy operator. The architecture is formulated by taking a number of local market and network constraints, that include residential battery energy sto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This reality is acknowledged by the authors of [17], who then create an optimum P2P decisionforming method that ensures a reduction in LEM participants' energy bills. LEM participants are instructed to transact between feed-in-tariff (FiT) rates and time-of-use (ToU) tariffs in [18] to make P2P trading profitable for both buyers (who can both be prosumers and consumers) and sellers (who can be prosumers only). To further reduce their energy expenditures by rearranging their energy usage behaviours, the authors in [19] also introduce the concept of P2P negawatt trading in the LEM.…”
Section: A Related Work 1) Electricity Cost Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reality is acknowledged by the authors of [17], who then create an optimum P2P decisionforming method that ensures a reduction in LEM participants' energy bills. LEM participants are instructed to transact between feed-in-tariff (FiT) rates and time-of-use (ToU) tariffs in [18] to make P2P trading profitable for both buyers (who can both be prosumers and consumers) and sellers (who can be prosumers only). To further reduce their energy expenditures by rearranging their energy usage behaviours, the authors in [19] also introduce the concept of P2P negawatt trading in the LEM.…”
Section: A Related Work 1) Electricity Cost Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is suitable when the market is volatile and depends on weather conditions, time of day, and geographical location. Moreover, for P2P energy sharing in MGs, pricing mechanisms need to consider factors, such as battery aging, the depreciation of RESs, energy transmission losses, and the wear and tear of related facilities, to avoid inaccurate initial pricing [40]. Table 2 summarizes the methods related to pricing mechanisms for P2P and M2M energy trading and sharing within five years.…”
Section: Pricing Mechanism Of P2p and M2m Electricity Tradingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the total sold P2P power ∑ l∈L P LEM−P2P (l, e) and the total P2P bought power ∑ u∈U P LEM−P2P (u, e) in the LEM should be equal, as captured in (26). In this case, ∑ l∈L P LEM−EX (l, e) − ∑ l∈L P LEM−GRD (l, e) = ∑ u∈U P LEM−UN (u, e) − ∑ u∈U P LEM−GRD (u, e) , as per ( 24) and (25).…”
Section: System Power Balancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some recent studies also focused on the possibility of incorporating energy stakeholders' interests into the LEM mechanism while P2P transactions are frequently executed. For example, to curtail the peak demand of the LEM participants, the authors in [26] proposed a power grid-engaged P2P trading scheme that could function as a prospective alternative to the conventional energy demand response. The exercise of P2P trading among LEM participants was further reported on in [27] to match the local supply with the local demand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%