“…These models generally include a description of the intrinsic binding constants in terms of a distribution, the affinity distribution or affinity spectrum, and an electrostatic contribution to account for the colloidal behavior of HS. The intrinsic affinity distribution has been assumed to be either discrete (effectively similar to a mixture of weak acids) ,, or continuous, with some assumed distribution function, ,,, but in both cases two main types of groups or sites have been included: carboxylic sites, with p K a in the range 3−5, and phenolic ones, with p K a about 8−10. The electrostatic contribution modeling has also followed two basic lines: one treated the humic substances as rigid particles, ,,− applying standard colloid chemistry models, whereas other authors applied, albeit sometimes in a restricted and approximate way, the concept of Donnan equilibrium. ,, In Tipping's WHAM models V and VI , a Donnan phase is assumed, surrounding the humic particles and containing only positively charged counterions, whereas the electrostatic effect on binding is accounted by an empirical Boltzmann factor; here the humic particles are assumed to be of fixed size (one value for fulvic acids, FA, and another one for humic acids, HA).…”