2022
DOI: 10.1111/1752-1688.12987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of a Large‐Scale Terrain‐Analysis‐Based Flood Mapping System to Hurricane Harvey

Abstract: We compare inundation estimates with high-water marks collected during Hurricane Harvey. Our system estimates depth with a 0.5-m mean error and extent covering 90% of that obtained from observations. ABSTRACT: Flood modeling provides inundation estimates and improves disaster preparedness and response. Recent development in hydrologic modeling and inundation mapping enables the creation of such estimates in near real time. To quantify their performance, these estimates need to be compared to measurements colle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus far, FACET outputs and its predecessor the Stream Channel and Floodplain Metric Toolbox (Hopkins, Lamont, et al, 2018) have been incorporated into modeling to estimate streambank sediment fluxes at local (Hopkins, Noe, et al, 2018) and regional scales (Noe et al, 2022). FACET outputs such as channel metrics and HAND grids may provide useful inputs for emerging approaches to regional flood inundation mapping which have used HAND methods in combination with synthetic rating curves (Ghanghas et al, 2022) or HAND in combination with high water marks from extreme weather events such as hurricanes (Zheng et al, 2022). Others have attempted to use HAND to derive hydraulic properties essential to hydraulic models, replacing the need for cross‐sectional measurements (Zheng, Tarboton, et al, 2018), which are typically obtained from field measurements of cross sections or regionally developed regression equations to predict bankfull depth and width.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus far, FACET outputs and its predecessor the Stream Channel and Floodplain Metric Toolbox (Hopkins, Lamont, et al, 2018) have been incorporated into modeling to estimate streambank sediment fluxes at local (Hopkins, Noe, et al, 2018) and regional scales (Noe et al, 2022). FACET outputs such as channel metrics and HAND grids may provide useful inputs for emerging approaches to regional flood inundation mapping which have used HAND methods in combination with synthetic rating curves (Ghanghas et al, 2022) or HAND in combination with high water marks from extreme weather events such as hurricanes (Zheng et al, 2022). Others have attempted to use HAND to derive hydraulic properties essential to hydraulic models, replacing the need for cross‐sectional measurements (Zheng, Tarboton, et al, 2018), which are typically obtained from field measurements of cross sections or regionally developed regression equations to predict bankfull depth and width.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where TP is true positive, TN is true negative, FP is false positive, and FN is false negative. We do not further test GeoFlood since it has been done in previous publications (Zheng et al, 2018a(Zheng et al, , 2022.…”
Section: Validation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GeoFlood has been shown to capture the general fluvial inundation patterns of flood events, with inundation extents overlapping with 60 %-90 % of FEMA inundation extents (Zheng et al, 2018(Zheng et al, , 2022. To compare Fill-Spill-Merge and our pluvial inundation estimates to a full hydrodynamic model, we employed a physically based 2D hydrodynamic model by using the software ProMaIDes (Protection Measures against Inundation Decision support).…”
Section: Pluvial Flooding Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%