2006
DOI: 10.1007/11816157_146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of a Strong Tracking Finite-Difference Extended Kalman Filter to Eye Tracking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhang et al proposed a nonlinear unscented Kalman filter for gaze estimation [7], which can overcome the difficulties of nonlinear gaze estimation and improve the accuracy of gaze estimation. Jiashu Zhang et al proposed to use several groups of points to match the posterior probability density function of eye movement [8], which is more accurate than the estimation effect of the traditional Kalman filter. Although nonlinear Kalman filtering algorithms can improve the accuracy of gaze estimation, they are numerically unstable in practical applications and require more computational time.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al proposed a nonlinear unscented Kalman filter for gaze estimation [7], which can overcome the difficulties of nonlinear gaze estimation and improve the accuracy of gaze estimation. Jiashu Zhang et al proposed to use several groups of points to match the posterior probability density function of eye movement [8], which is more accurate than the estimation effect of the traditional Kalman filter. Although nonlinear Kalman filtering algorithms can improve the accuracy of gaze estimation, they are numerically unstable in practical applications and require more computational time.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[42], [43], and [44]) clearly reveal the significant features of the classical approach as follows: 1) Due to the use of the notions as "the state of the system" and "the state propagation equation" this approach is strongly based on analytical system modeling; 2) It emphasizes the need of (possibly) complete information on, and control of the actual state of the system (the notions as "observability", and "controllability" as well as the general efforts for constructing Kalman Filters or Extended Kalman Filters that are widely used model-based state estimators (e.g. [45], [46]) evidently highlight this fact); 3) Though being "liberated from the confines of the frequency domain" till it is strictly related to linear, linearizable, or fully or partly linearized state space models that can be caught in the consistent use of the terminology as "Linear Time-Invariant (LTI) Systems", "Linear Parameter Varying (LPV) Systems", and "Quasi Linear Parameter Varying (qLPV) Systems" in the control technology of our days.…”
Section: Implications For Control Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%