Proceedings of the 1998 American Control Conference. ACC (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36207) 1998
DOI: 10.1109/acc.1998.688386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of adaptive controllers to a solar power plant using a multi-model description

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When compared to the related approaches Pickhardt 1998 , the setpoint tracking performance of the gain-scheduled pole placement controller appears to be signi cantly better. One reason for this is that our approach is based on more accurate higher-order local models while the lower order models used in Pickhardt 1998 cannot be expected to capture the anti-resonant modes.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When compared to the related approaches Pickhardt 1998 , the setpoint tracking performance of the gain-scheduled pole placement controller appears to be signi cantly better. One reason for this is that our approach is based on more accurate higher-order local models while the lower order models used in Pickhardt 1998 cannot be expected to capture the anti-resonant modes.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason for this is that our approach is based on more accurate higher-order local models while the lower order models used in Pickhardt 1998 cannot be expected to capture the anti-resonant modes. Another reason is that the local controllers are scheduled on the actual oil ow rate in our approach rather than the predicted steady-state oil ow rate, as in Pickhardt 1998 , or local model performance measures, as in Rato et al 1997 , both of which correspond to lower bandwidth in the scheduler.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As the plant dynamics are mainly affected by the changes in the fluid flow, two tables of the process and the controller parameters were obtained for different fluid flow values. An alternative gain scheduling MPC approach, but also based on the fluid flow value, is proposed in [44] where linear ARMAX models were identified on-line for different operating points and used for an indirect adaptive MPC controller. 4) Nonlinear MPC: Linear control techniques can be effective in physical processes, which exhibit nonlinear behaviour to a small degree, for example where one is limited to a narrow range of operation.…”
Section: ) Gain Scheduling Mpcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these models are not able to capture the intrinsic resonance dynamics of this kind of system. For the best representation of system dynamics, nonlinear models [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], frequency-based adaptive models [15] and high-order linear models have been proposed in the literature [5,[16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%