Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
The Wamsutter (Almond) formation in southwest Wyoming is a tight gas reservoir in the eastern part of the Greater Green River Basin (GGRB). The Almond formation is generally encountered between depths of 8,500 and 10,500 feet with reservoir pressures varying from initial conditions (0.54–0.58 psi/ft) in the Lower Almond to varying stages of pressure depletion in the Upper Almond. The Almond interval is generally completed via massive hydraulic fracture stimulation down casing with a series of treatments targeting the Lower, Main and Upper Almond intervals. These zones are subsequently commingled for production. In the absence of reservoir properties such as in-situ reservoir permeability, reservoir pressure, and closure stress, it has been difficult to optimize the stimulation treatments on a zonal basis. To identify these reservoir characteristics, pre-fracture impulse injection testing has been performed in each interval. These simple, easy to perform transient tests have aided in the interpretation of the key reservoir parameters. This work presents data from eleven wells in the Wamsutter field and describes the methodology used to optimize the stimulation treatments. Reservoir properties obtained from the impulse tests helped eliminate the addition of nitrogen to the fracturing fluid, which had been routinely included to aid fracture clean-up after fracture stimulation. This design change has led to more effective fracture stimulation treatments yielding higher gas production rates while significantly reducing completion costs. Production from wells stimulated with the modified design is compared to production from wells that were stimulated without the benefit of reservoir properties obtained from the pre-fracture impulse tests. Introduction The Almond formation is the uppermost member of the Mesaverde Group in the GGRB and is one of the most prolific producers of natural gas in southwestern Wyoming. A field map showing various areas that produce from the Almond formation is shown in Figure 1. Gas wells targeting the Almond formation are hydraulically fracture stimulated in multiple perforated intervals. In this type of multilayer environment, it is very important to ascertain reservoir properties such as reservoir permeability and reservoir pressure in key intervals for optimum fracture design. The Almond formation consists of three to four individual intervals varying in terms of depositional environment. Generally, these are named the Lower Almond, Middle Almond and the Upper Almond 1. The Lower Almond formation overlies the Ericson sandstone and is treated in the first of a three to four stage stimulation treatment. This fluvial formation is composed of interbedded siltsone, coal and sandstone. Porosity is on the order of 8–10% and the net pay thickness varies between 10.0 and 25.0 feet. A type log is shown in Figure 2. The Middle Almond is very similar to the Lower Almond in terms of porosity and pay thickness. As coal intervals separate the Middle and Lower Almond intervals, fracture designs are developed to stimulate these separately. The Upper Almond or the Bar sand as it is commonly known is a thick 40.0 foot marine sandstone interval that underlies the massive Lewis shale. Log porosities are higher in this pay sand and often the neutron-density log crossover effect is not noticed in this sand. The Upper Almond is laterally continuous and has a higher permeability than the Lower and Middle Almond intervals. The large number of wells completed in the Bar sand has resulted in pressure depletion in certain areas of the field. Recent wells that were completed in this interval have shown lower than original pore pressure gradients. It has been shown in various studies that the Bar sand dominates well performance and production is supplemented by the Lower and Middle Almond intervals 2–3.
The Wamsutter (Almond) formation in southwest Wyoming is a tight gas reservoir in the eastern part of the Greater Green River Basin (GGRB). The Almond formation is generally encountered between depths of 8,500 and 10,500 feet with reservoir pressures varying from initial conditions (0.54–0.58 psi/ft) in the Lower Almond to varying stages of pressure depletion in the Upper Almond. The Almond interval is generally completed via massive hydraulic fracture stimulation down casing with a series of treatments targeting the Lower, Main and Upper Almond intervals. These zones are subsequently commingled for production. In the absence of reservoir properties such as in-situ reservoir permeability, reservoir pressure, and closure stress, it has been difficult to optimize the stimulation treatments on a zonal basis. To identify these reservoir characteristics, pre-fracture impulse injection testing has been performed in each interval. These simple, easy to perform transient tests have aided in the interpretation of the key reservoir parameters. This work presents data from eleven wells in the Wamsutter field and describes the methodology used to optimize the stimulation treatments. Reservoir properties obtained from the impulse tests helped eliminate the addition of nitrogen to the fracturing fluid, which had been routinely included to aid fracture clean-up after fracture stimulation. This design change has led to more effective fracture stimulation treatments yielding higher gas production rates while significantly reducing completion costs. Production from wells stimulated with the modified design is compared to production from wells that were stimulated without the benefit of reservoir properties obtained from the pre-fracture impulse tests. Introduction The Almond formation is the uppermost member of the Mesaverde Group in the GGRB and is one of the most prolific producers of natural gas in southwestern Wyoming. A field map showing various areas that produce from the Almond formation is shown in Figure 1. Gas wells targeting the Almond formation are hydraulically fracture stimulated in multiple perforated intervals. In this type of multilayer environment, it is very important to ascertain reservoir properties such as reservoir permeability and reservoir pressure in key intervals for optimum fracture design. The Almond formation consists of three to four individual intervals varying in terms of depositional environment. Generally, these are named the Lower Almond, Middle Almond and the Upper Almond 1. The Lower Almond formation overlies the Ericson sandstone and is treated in the first of a three to four stage stimulation treatment. This fluvial formation is composed of interbedded siltsone, coal and sandstone. Porosity is on the order of 8–10% and the net pay thickness varies between 10.0 and 25.0 feet. A type log is shown in Figure 2. The Middle Almond is very similar to the Lower Almond in terms of porosity and pay thickness. As coal intervals separate the Middle and Lower Almond intervals, fracture designs are developed to stimulate these separately. The Upper Almond or the Bar sand as it is commonly known is a thick 40.0 foot marine sandstone interval that underlies the massive Lewis shale. Log porosities are higher in this pay sand and often the neutron-density log crossover effect is not noticed in this sand. The Upper Almond is laterally continuous and has a higher permeability than the Lower and Middle Almond intervals. The large number of wells completed in the Bar sand has resulted in pressure depletion in certain areas of the field. Recent wells that were completed in this interval have shown lower than original pore pressure gradients. It has been shown in various studies that the Bar sand dominates well performance and production is supplemented by the Lower and Middle Almond intervals 2–3.
With the increase in demand and rapidly diminishing resources in conventional reservoirs, economically producing gas from unconventional reservoirs e.g. tight gas reservoir is a great challenge today. The character and distribution of tight gas reservoirs are not yet well understood. Low quality reservoirs are often seen as involving higher costs and risk than high-medium quality reservoirs. There is no formal definition for "Tight Gas". Law and Curtis (2002) defined low-permeability (tight) reservoirs as those with permeabilities less than 0.1 mD. The best definition of tight gas reservoir is "reservoirs that cannot be produced at economic flow rates or economic volumes of natural gas are unrecoverable, unless the well is stimulated by a large hydraulic fracture treatment or produced by use of a horizontal wellbore or multilateral wellbores." Unlike conventional reservoirs, which are small in volume but easy to develop, unconventional reservoirs are large in volume but difficult to develop. Improved technology and adequate gas price is the key to their development. Gas production from a tight-gas well will be low on a per-well basis compared with gas production from conventional reservoirs. A lot of wells have to be drilled to get most of the gas out of the ground in tight gas reservoirs. Testing a tight gas reservoir is a big challenge today but in coming future more and more numbers of wells are expected in tight gas reservoirs. If we want to grab a piece of this upcoming opportunity, we will have to accept the challenge today. More data and more engineering manpower are required to understand and design a well test in tight gas reservoir than a well test in good permeability conventional reservoirs. In this paper, a possible way to test a tight gas reservoir using hydraulic fracturing will be discussed. Since hydraulic fracturing is one of the most successful ways of producing a tight gas reservoir economically so far, an idea of integrating hydraulic fracturing job with well testing job as a complete package for testing tight gas reservoirs, especially in the exploratory phase, will be discussed.
This paper was selected for presentation by an SPE program committee following review of information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). Contents of the paper have not been reviewed by the Society of Petroleum Engineers and are subject to correction by the author(s). The material does not necessarily reflect any position of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, its officers, or members. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper without the written consent of the Society of Petroleum Engineers is prohibited. Permission to reproduce in print is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words; illustrations may not be copied. The abstract must contain conspicuous acknowledgment of SPE copyright.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.