2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.03.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of √area-concept to assess fatigue strength of AlSi7Cu0.5Mg casted components

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To increase the applicable data a power-function like projection method for specimens failed in the finite life region is executed. This method is suitable to increase the data points in the run out region of N = 1×10 7 without significant falsification of the scatter band in the HCF region 1/T s , see [21].…”
Section: Fatigue Assessment Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To increase the applicable data a power-function like projection method for specimens failed in the finite life region is executed. This method is suitable to increase the data points in the run out region of N = 1×10 7 without significant falsification of the scatter band in the HCF region 1/T s , see [21].…”
Section: Fatigue Assessment Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Murakami proposed the exponent m of the defect size to possess a constant value of 3, which revealed sound results for preliminary studies [21]. Furthermore, Murakami estimated the material and defect location coefficient C 1 as 1.43 for surface and 1.56 for subsurface cracks and the material dependent parameter C 2 to possess a constant value of 120 by applying the least squares method [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of porosity in the fatigue properties has been assessed in traditional cast 21 and powder metallurgy 22 materials, which is based on specimen-level testing and fractography investigation post mortem. The sizes of pores that initiate fatigue cracks have been applied in a Murakami-type analysis, 23 where the defect strength is taken as the remote stress multiplied by a factor of the square root of the projected area of the pore onto the principal stress axis, 24,25 or a Kitagawa-Takahashi method, 26 which relates the fatigue crack growth threshold concept to the high-cycle fatigue (HCF) endurance limit. 25 These methods have been applied to AM materials, 15 although these approaches do not capture the complex interactions of the local microstructure surrounding the pore.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The defect size is evaluated as the projected flaw area perpendicular to the direction of the maximum principal normal stress [29]. On the one hand, preliminary studies [38] reveal a proper conformance with Murakami’s empirical approach, but the present model does not invoke the defect size distribution itself. As presented in preliminary studies [39,40,41,42], the statistical distribution of flaw sizes can be evaluated by non-destructive investigation of the defect population, such as X-ray computed tomography scanning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%