[1990] Proceedings. Third Annual IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems
DOI: 10.1109/cbmsys.1990.109419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of artificial neural networks for tissue classification from multispectral magnetic resonance images of the head

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the features are MR signal intensities from various MRI modalities (such as T1, T2, PD), then the Gaussian model assumption can be poor (Clarke et al, 1993;DeCarli et al, 1992;Schellenberg et al, 1990) : besides biological causes such as the intrinsic heterogeneity within the tissue classes that concern this paper (CSF, grey matter, white matter), the MRI acquisition artifacts also affect the intensity distributions -i.e. result in deviations from a Normal distribution (Ashburner, 2000;Kollokian, 1996;Schellenberg et al, 1990). While intensity non-uniformity can be reduced by retrospective correction methods (e.g.…”
Section: Feature Space Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the features are MR signal intensities from various MRI modalities (such as T1, T2, PD), then the Gaussian model assumption can be poor (Clarke et al, 1993;DeCarli et al, 1992;Schellenberg et al, 1990) : besides biological causes such as the intrinsic heterogeneity within the tissue classes that concern this paper (CSF, grey matter, white matter), the MRI acquisition artifacts also affect the intensity distributions -i.e. result in deviations from a Normal distribution (Ashburner, 2000;Kollokian, 1996;Schellenberg et al, 1990). While intensity non-uniformity can be reduced by retrospective correction methods (e.g.…”
Section: Feature Space Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%