“…[10] Impeller high-pressure and low-pressure side diameter, impeller low-pressure side hub diameter, impeller high-pressure side exit width Hydraulic efficiency in differient mass flow rate CFD and Experiment MOGA Wang et al [11] Hub inlet angle, hub exit angle, hub wrap angle, leading-edge wrap angle at hub, shroud inlet angle, shroud exit angle, shroud wrap angle, and the leading edge wrap angle at the shroud Efficiency and NPSHr CFD and Experiment MOGA Derakhshan et al [7] Hub diameter, suction diameter, impeller diameter, impeller width, inlet, and outlet blade angles Efficiency and total pressure difference CFD and Experiment ABC Derakhshan and M. Bashiri. [12] Hub diameter, suction diameter, impeller diameter, impeller width, and inlet and outlet blade angles Efficiency and total pressure difference CFD and Experiment ES Liu et al [13] Hub streamline and shroud streamline Hydraulic efficiency CFD and Experiment AFSA Wang et al [14] Four angles for the sweep and lean Efficiencies at two working points and total pressure ratio CFD NSGA-II Zhao et al [5] Blade outlet angle, blade inlet angle, splitter offset angle, impeller meridional section Anti-cavitation ability and the hydraulic efficiency CFD and Experiment NSGA-II Pei et al [15] The shroud radius, the hub radius, the shroud angle, and the hub angle As can be seen in Table 1, a problem that existed in the past research is that major parameters affecting the performance of LSSCP, namely head, efficiency, shaft power, and suction capability, have not been fully considered as the optimization objectives. This is due to the shortcomings of the global optimization algorithm, such as encoding complexity and long iterations.…”