2018
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/196/1/012043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of biofloc technology (BFT) in shrimp aquaculture industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Owing to the ever increasing and serious environmental challenges bedeviling shrimp aquaculture farms especially in wastewater handling, a new technology has been developed. Biofloc technology (BFT) makes use of isolated biofloc boost-up bacterium inoculums to enhance better water quality of the shrimp culture in order to improve shrimp growth (Kasan et al, 2018;El-Sayed, 2021). This technology is a partial departure from the conventional biological filter used to remove ammonia, nitrate and dissolved organic solid in recirculation aquaculture system.…”
Section: Biofloc Technology (Bft) In Shrimp Aquaculture Wastewater Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to the ever increasing and serious environmental challenges bedeviling shrimp aquaculture farms especially in wastewater handling, a new technology has been developed. Biofloc technology (BFT) makes use of isolated biofloc boost-up bacterium inoculums to enhance better water quality of the shrimp culture in order to improve shrimp growth (Kasan et al, 2018;El-Sayed, 2021). This technology is a partial departure from the conventional biological filter used to remove ammonia, nitrate and dissolved organic solid in recirculation aquaculture system.…”
Section: Biofloc Technology (Bft) In Shrimp Aquaculture Wastewater Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers have pointed out that biofloc grown aquatic animals have enhanced resistance to pathogenic microbial infections ( Figure 3 ) ( Azim and Little, 2008 ; Crab et al, 2012 ; Pérez-Rostro et al, 2014 ; Luis-villaseñor et al, 2016 ; Anand et al, 2017 ; Bossier and Ekasari, 2017 ; Lee et al, 2017 ; Kasan et al, 2018 ; Pacheco-Vega et al, 2018 ; Fatimah et al, 2019 ; Kumar et al, 2020b ). One of the possible scenarios that might be involved behind this induced resistance is improved immunity and health of cultured animals in biofloc as also suggested in an earlier paragraph.…”
Section: Interaction Of Biofloc Derived Microbial Community With Pathogenic Microorganismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recommended C:N range to promote biofloc formation is from 11 to 20:1 (Ebeling et al 2006;Avnimelech 2012;Pérez-Fuentes et al 2016). Some studies used 15:1 C:N ratio (Kasan et al 2018;Cang et al 2019) while others adapted the maximum recommended ratio of 20:1 (de Souza et al 2019;Reinoso et al 2019). In practice, up to 20:1 is the recommended C:N ratio on the first three months of culture followed by a reduction to around 15:1 at the latter part of the culture to manage the decline of pH and production of settled biomass (Pérez-Fuentes et al 2016).…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%