2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2016.10.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of chitosan and gelatin based active packaging films for peeled shrimp preservation: A novel functional wrapping design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
37
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
11
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, no LAB was found at the first day of our experiment, but from day 2 they started to rise in control sample and reached to 7.41 log CFU/g on day 14 of refrigerated storage (Figure (d)). The absence of LAB (<1 log CFU/g) in fresh raw meat and meat products have been reported in other studies (Jouki et al, ; Khezrian & Shahbazi, ; Mohebi & Shahbazi, ). Higher LAB count was reported by Emiroğlu et al () for ground beef patties (4.2 log CFU/g) and Karabagias et al () for lamb meat (3.6 log CFU/g).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, no LAB was found at the first day of our experiment, but from day 2 they started to rise in control sample and reached to 7.41 log CFU/g on day 14 of refrigerated storage (Figure (d)). The absence of LAB (<1 log CFU/g) in fresh raw meat and meat products have been reported in other studies (Jouki et al, ; Khezrian & Shahbazi, ; Mohebi & Shahbazi, ). Higher LAB count was reported by Emiroğlu et al () for ground beef patties (4.2 log CFU/g) and Karabagias et al () for lamb meat (3.6 log CFU/g).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Moreover, packed meat samples with EPE (1 and 2%) in combination with CN (1 and 2%) significantly had final PSC approximately 3–5 log CFU/g lower than the control group ( p < .05). In other related studies, Mohebi and Shahbazi () investigated the effects of CH and gelatin films containing ZEO (0 and 1%), pomegranate peel extract (PPE; 0 and 1%) and CN (0 and 1%), separately and in combination, on survival of Listeria monocytogenes and shelf‐life extension of fresh shrimp during refrigerated storage. These authors also reported that the groups treated with CN 1% had significantly lower PSC (approximately 1 log CFU/g) compared to the control group ( p < .05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to our results, there were significant differences among the mean PTC of treated groups with ZEO during the entire storage period ( p < .05). Based on previous studies, ZEO effectively inhibits PTC in fishery and meat products (Kakaei & Shahbazi, ; Mohebi & Shahbazi, ; Shahbazi et al, ; Shavisi et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Proximate compositions (moisture, crude protein, lipid, and ash contents) were determined at Day 0 according to the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) procedures (AOAC, ). For bacteriological analysis, meatball samples, each weighing 10 g were homogenized with 90 ml of 0.1% peptone water for 1 min in a stomacher and diluted using 10‐fold serial dilution for plating onto selective agars including plate count agar (TVC and total psychrotrophic bacteria, incubated at 30 °C for 48 hr and 7 °C for 10 days, respectively), Pseudomonas agar ( Pseudomonas spp., incubated at 30 °C for 48 hr), Violet Red Bile Glucose (VRBG) agar (Enterobacteriaceae, incubated at 37 °C for 48 hr), Palcam Listeria selective agar ( L. monocytogenes , incubated at 30 °C for 48 hr), and Baird Parker agar ( S. aureus , incubated at 37 °C for 48 hr) (Mohebi & Shahbazi, ). TVB‐N content and PV of meatball samples were determined according to the method of Volpe et al ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many fruits develop a waxy coat on their epidermis as they mature on the plant but this natural waxy coat is not adequate to offer protection against water loss and high respiration rate that follow when they are removed from the living tree leading to the spoilage of these fresh produce. Such post-harvest losses can be reduced to some extent by increasing the wax content on fruit surface [1,2] utilizing low temperature technologies [3], efficient packaging [4], use of coatings [5][6][7][8][9][10], nanotechnology [11][12][13], osmotic dehydration, irradiation [14,15] and other ______________________________ *Corresponding author: Email: anjali.bishnoi@srict.in, anjali_bishnoi@yahoo.com techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%