2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2019.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of classification criteria of Sjogren syndrome in patients with sicca symptoms: Real-world experience at a medical center

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, diagnosis of SS is based on established classification criteria: the 2002 AECG Classification Criteria, 2012 SICCA criteria, 2016 ACR/EULAR criteria [17,38,39]. The majority of rheumatologists in Taiwan during study period applied the 2002 AECG criteria for the diagnosis of SS [40]. A primary SS diagnosis requires symptoms that meet four of the six AECG criteria or three of the four objective diagnostic criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, diagnosis of SS is based on established classification criteria: the 2002 AECG Classification Criteria, 2012 SICCA criteria, 2016 ACR/EULAR criteria [17,38,39]. The majority of rheumatologists in Taiwan during study period applied the 2002 AECG criteria for the diagnosis of SS [40]. A primary SS diagnosis requires symptoms that meet four of the six AECG criteria or three of the four objective diagnostic criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After comparing the gold standard data of surgical or pathological diagnosis, it was found that the index of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of placenta accreta was 74%, which was slightly higher than that of color Doppler diagnostic index of 60.5%; there was no significant difference in the diagnostic index between the two groups ( P > 0.05) [ 22 ]. The kappa value of magnetic resonance imaging was 0.739, and the kappa value of acoustic Doppler was 0.610, both > 0.4, which were consistent with the gold standard, as shown in Table 4 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, neither Schirmer's nor Saxon's tests were statistically significantly different between patient and control groups, pointing to low diagnostic performance in both detecting SS patients and differentiating non-specific sicca symptoms from SS-associated ones, as can be also seen by the results of the ROC analyses. The low specificity of tests such as Schirmer's has also been pointed out by Chiu et al in a single-center retrospective casecontrol study examining a large cohort (n = 505 patients) [36]. Moreover, van Nimwegen et al showed poor diagnostic accuracy in a study that had as an objective the validation of the actual ACR/EULAR classification criteria [37].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%