2012
DOI: 10.4050/jahs.57.032007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics/Computational Structural Dynamics Coupling for Analysis of Rotorcraft Airloads and Blade Loads in Maneuvering Flight

Abstract: This paper presents coupled calculations of both the airloads and structural loads for the UH-60A main rotor during the UTTAS pull-up maneuver performed under the NASA/Army UH-60A Airloads Program. These calculations were performed using OVERFLOW-2, a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solver, coupled to the Rotorcraft Comprehensive Analysis System (RCAS), a rotorcraft comprehensive analysis. For time-varying maneuvers, the two codes were tightly coupled and exchanged airloads and structural deflections at eve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the load factor begins to increase when the helicopter starts to pull up, there is a significant difference between the prediction and the flight-test measurement (around 6000 lb). This may be due to the contributions from the fuselage and the horizontal tail, and it has been clarified by Bhagwat et al [7]. Figure 17 shows the sectional normal forces at 86:5%R, predicted by the coupled analysis.…”
Section: Blade Airloadsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As the load factor begins to increase when the helicopter starts to pull up, there is a significant difference between the prediction and the flight-test measurement (around 6000 lb). This may be due to the contributions from the fuselage and the horizontal tail, and it has been clarified by Bhagwat et al [7]. Figure 17 shows the sectional normal forces at 86:5%R, predicted by the coupled analysis.…”
Section: Blade Airloadsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Abhishek et al [9] carried out a simpler lifting-line analysis, also for an isolated rotor, with an attempt to calculate the rotor pitch control angles: it was unsuccessful due to large errors stemming from the unknown horizontal tail lift during the maneuver and an inability to predict the maneuver trajectories in absence of detailed aircraft data. Subsequently, with availability of flight-test control angles, several researchers have predicted loads for this prescribed maneuver: Abhishek et al [10] and Yeo [11] focused on lower-fidelity lifting-line predictions, [7,8] compared the lifting-line model's capabilities with CFD/CSD analysis, [12] employed wake-coupling CFD/CSD approach, and [13] examined the effect of time-accurate coupling using RANS. The lifting-line analyses in general shows less satisfactory correlation with measured flight-test data when compared with CFD analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, the highly energetic concentrated tip vortex generated and rolled up in the blade tip region constantly remains within the vicinity of the operating blades. The close interaction between the wake and the blade may lead to impulsive airloads and increase the rotor's vibration and noise levels (Bhagwat, Ormiston, Saberi, & Xin, 2012). Given the complexity stated above, rotor-wake dynamics and performance predictions remain the most challenging tasks for rotor aerodynamics modeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in-depth correlation studies have not been performed. In recent years, there has been significant progress in aeromechanics prediction capability using coupled computational fluid dynamics (CFD) / rotorcraft computational structural dynamics (CSD) analyses [11,12]. The CFD methods, which use a high fidelity, Navier-Stokes, overset grid methodology with first-principles-based wake capturing, overcame the limitations of the conventional lifting line aerodynamics used in rotorcraft comprehensive codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%