22nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting 1984
DOI: 10.2514/6.1984-121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of computational methods to the design of large turbofanengine nacelles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pressure forces over the plug are represented by È pl (equation (9)). The drag coefficient of the cowl after-body is represented by the C Daft-body term as defined in equation (10). Where D aft-body is the drag force that is calculated by the integration of the pressure distribution over the cowl after-body surface and A ref is the configuration reference area based on the nacelle max diameter.…”
Section: Nozzle Performance Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The pressure forces over the plug are represented by È pl (equation (9)). The drag coefficient of the cowl after-body is represented by the C Daft-body term as defined in equation (10). Where D aft-body is the drag force that is calculated by the integration of the pressure distribution over the cowl after-body surface and A ref is the configuration reference area based on the nacelle max diameter.…”
Section: Nozzle Performance Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a separate jet configuration, Lennard and Fasching 9 showed that the change in the curvature of the internal walls of the fan and core nozzles provided a 1.0% improvement in C v at cruise conditions. Lahti et al 10 Moreover, Zhang et al 6 showed that results from a RANS simulation using the k-ω SST turbulence model were within 0.2% and 0.3% for C d and C fg , respectively, of the experimental data. This was for a three-dimensional single stream nozzle configuration across NPR range from 1.2 to 7.0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation