Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Objectives/Scope Single well deconvolution (von Schroeter et al., 2001) has been added to the well test interpretation toolbox nearly twenty years ago. In recent years, the single well deconvolution algorithm has been extended to multiple interfering wells (Cumming et al., 2013), and further improved with the additions of constraints to account for existing a-priory knowledge on the reservoir (constrained multiwell deconvolution, Cumming et al., 2019). The main objective of multiwell deconvolution is to identify the signatures of all wells involved and the interference signals between wells, from which information can be extracted about the reservoir that may not be obtainable otherwise, e.g. heterogeneities, boundaries and compartmentalization. The single well deconvolution algorithm has also been shown to be capable of restoring erroneous or missing rates (Gringarten, 2010). As shown in this paper, the same is true with multiwell deconvolution, which is able to restore erroneous or missing rates in all the wells involved. Methods, Procedures, Process Starting with arbitrary initial guesses for the missing rates in the various wells involved, we use multiwell deconvolution to estimate these missing flow rates or correct for erroneous ones. Two methods are presented: (1) we use unconstrained multiwell deconvolution as a first step to estimate the missing/erroneous rates, then use constrained multiwell deconvolution with these rates to estimate deconvolved derivatives; and (2) we restore/correct the flow rates and derive deconvolved derivatives simultaneously using constrained multiwell deconvolution. We show that the first approach is more accurate than the second one. In both approaches, we only obtain rates that are proportional to the true flow rates. To obtain the true flow rates, we need to know either one of the actual flow rates in each well, or the corresponding permeabilities. Results, Observations, Conclusions We prove the ability of multiwell deconvolution to estimate rates on synthetic oil reservoirs and gas reservoirs with moderate average reservoir pressure depletion, that include non-interfering wells. We then apply to oil and gas field examples and compare restored vs. actually measured rates. In all cases, the agreement is very good. Novel/Additive Information Using only measured pressure data, constrained multiwell deconvolution can be used to restore unknown flow rates and/or correct for erroneous rates, in addition to estimating deconvolved derivatives of all wells. This is particularly useful in the case of allocated rates or when rates are missing in some of the interfering wells.
Objectives/Scope Single well deconvolution (von Schroeter et al., 2001) has been added to the well test interpretation toolbox nearly twenty years ago. In recent years, the single well deconvolution algorithm has been extended to multiple interfering wells (Cumming et al., 2013), and further improved with the additions of constraints to account for existing a-priory knowledge on the reservoir (constrained multiwell deconvolution, Cumming et al., 2019). The main objective of multiwell deconvolution is to identify the signatures of all wells involved and the interference signals between wells, from which information can be extracted about the reservoir that may not be obtainable otherwise, e.g. heterogeneities, boundaries and compartmentalization. The single well deconvolution algorithm has also been shown to be capable of restoring erroneous or missing rates (Gringarten, 2010). As shown in this paper, the same is true with multiwell deconvolution, which is able to restore erroneous or missing rates in all the wells involved. Methods, Procedures, Process Starting with arbitrary initial guesses for the missing rates in the various wells involved, we use multiwell deconvolution to estimate these missing flow rates or correct for erroneous ones. Two methods are presented: (1) we use unconstrained multiwell deconvolution as a first step to estimate the missing/erroneous rates, then use constrained multiwell deconvolution with these rates to estimate deconvolved derivatives; and (2) we restore/correct the flow rates and derive deconvolved derivatives simultaneously using constrained multiwell deconvolution. We show that the first approach is more accurate than the second one. In both approaches, we only obtain rates that are proportional to the true flow rates. To obtain the true flow rates, we need to know either one of the actual flow rates in each well, or the corresponding permeabilities. Results, Observations, Conclusions We prove the ability of multiwell deconvolution to estimate rates on synthetic oil reservoirs and gas reservoirs with moderate average reservoir pressure depletion, that include non-interfering wells. We then apply to oil and gas field examples and compare restored vs. actually measured rates. In all cases, the agreement is very good. Novel/Additive Information Using only measured pressure data, constrained multiwell deconvolution can be used to restore unknown flow rates and/or correct for erroneous rates, in addition to estimating deconvolved derivatives of all wells. This is particularly useful in the case of allocated rates or when rates are missing in some of the interfering wells.
This paper presents an analysis of the Corrib field surveillance dynamic pressure and rate data. The Corrib field, on production since December 2015, is a gas reservoir developed with six wells. The field static gas initially in place (GIIP) is around 1.2 Tcf of dry gas and the reservoir is comprised of a complex heterogeneous sandstone consisting of a high net to gross sequence of low sinuosity braided fluvial channel, sheet sand, playa and sandflat facies of varying reservoir quality (from single to hundreds of millidarcys) with an abundance of mapped faults. The dynamic reservoir analysis approach used in this study is based on a form of pressure-rate deconvolution that has been presented in an earlier paper SPE-195441 for the Tamar field, Israel. The pressure transient analysis (PTA) software that implements this analysis capability handles both singlewell and multi-well analysis problems. From a preliminary review of Corrib field dynamic behavior, it was concluded that this field data can be analyzed using single-well pressure-rate deconvolution applied to the data of each reservoir well separately. This contrasts with the Tamar field that required a true multiwell deconvolution analysis approach. Different approaches in these cases are dictated by the differences in reservoir architecture, geology, offtake strategy and the character of connectivity across these two fields. There are several pressure-rate deconvolution algorithms implemented in different PTA software tools used in the industry. All these algorithms implement a form of automatic regression and are sensitive to the quality of pressure and rate data that serve as input into the deconvolution algorithm. These automatic algorithms are often not robust enough to be used with surveillance type data acquired during long term production operations. The deconvolution approach used in this work is not automatic and, as a result, the deconvolution results are not as sensitive to the data quality. Rather, it relies on specialized software that facilitates manual reconstruction of constant rate drawdown responses. This human approach in combination with specialized software allows an engineer not to just reconstruct a drawdown response but to "explore" the pressure and rate data to develop significant insights of the dynamic reservoir behavior. This deeper understanding is an additional advantage over automated techniques and is the purpose of reservoir analysis. The Corrib field analysis discussed in this paper is a demonstration of what can be achieved using this combination of human intelligence and specialized software tools. Demonstration of the workflow used for manual reconstruction of deconvolved response functions and the role of the specialized software used that implements this workflow is explained. In the course of this reconstruction, an "exploration" process of trying to reconstruct the transient pressure behavior reflected in the data is engaged/utilized. Once reconstructed, this response is interpreted in terms of reservoir and well properties. The end result of this investigation is a deep understanding of the Corrib gas field dynamic behavior not easily obtained from conventional PTA methods. For example, it shows that early production data clearly exhibit signs of interference between wells. However, once the field production drops off the plateau period and the well production starts to decline, the six producing wells dynamically divide the reservoir into separate drainage areas and the well interference in a way "disappears" - the wells behave as if each of them produces from its own drainage compartment. This allows pressure rate deconvolution on a single-well basis, based on each compartment instead of using multi-well deconvolution on the field as a whole. The pore volume of each such compartment is reflected in the late time pressure behavior of the respective drawdown response associated with the well data. The sum of these individual pore volumes per well in the field yields the total pore volume connected to the wells that is supported by the reservoir dynamic behavior. These insights are reinforced by the use of synthetic models to provide clarity and understanding of the drainage compartment theory used during Corrib analysis.
This paper employs an ensemble-based method to address and assess the uncertainty in solutions to the single- and multi-well pressure-rate deconvolution problem. The method is implemented in two field cases from the Campos Basin. The first field case comprises a single vertical well producing from a virgin reservoir with continuous recording of bottom-hole pressure but uncertain flow-rate history. The second field case comprises a pair of horizontal wells, one acting as a producer and the other as an injector, with similar uncertainties in the flow-rate history and the additional complexity of a multi-well problem. We extend the investigation into the solution of the pressure-rate deconvolution proposed in a previous work (Kubota and Piccinini, 2022), which relies on the fundamental solution of the diffusion equation for bounded domains. In the present study, the deconvolved pressure response is obtained using the Ensemble Smoother with Multiple Data Assimilation (ES-MDA), a popular method for history matching numerical reservoir simulation models. ES-MDA provides an uncertainty quantification of the deconvolved pressure response and the investigated porous volume, along with other reservoir properties. Because ES-MDA uses a Bayesian formulation, data are weighted according to the inverse of the error variance. We explore this feature to include data from flowing periods, a desirable feature for the analysis of long-term pressure data with few well shut-ins. The results obtained for the two field cases consist of the posterior ensemble of model parameters, estimated flow rates, investigated pore volume, productivity index, single-well deconvolved response, as well as interference responses for the multi-well case.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.