2017
DOI: 10.5194/hess-21-751-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of CryoSat-2 altimetry data for river analysis and modelling

Abstract: Abstract. Availability of in situ river monitoring data, especially of data shared across boundaries, is decreasing, despite growing challenges for water resource management across the entire globe. This is especially valid for the case study of this work, the Brahmaputra Basin in South Asia. Commonly, satellite altimeters are used in various ways to provide information about such river basins. Most missions provide virtual station time series of water levels at locations where their repeat orbits cross rivers… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Performance slightly decreases in the validation period, in particular for the Ngounié virtual stations and the FEWS-RFE model. When comparing the simulated water depth amplitudes to those observed at each station, the RMSD is 0.74 m for the TRMM model and 0.87 m for FEWS-RFE, corresponding to 0.85 and 0.94 times the standard deviation of annual water height amplitude (Table 7).This is comparable to the study by Schneider et al (2017), in which they obtained an average RMSE of 0.83 m for the Brahmaputra after calibrating the river cross sections in a hydrodynamic model against Envisat virtual stations. Figure 10 shows the water height fluctuations at two of the virtual stations.…”
Section: River Stagesupporting
confidence: 76%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Performance slightly decreases in the validation period, in particular for the Ngounié virtual stations and the FEWS-RFE model. When comparing the simulated water depth amplitudes to those observed at each station, the RMSD is 0.74 m for the TRMM model and 0.87 m for FEWS-RFE, corresponding to 0.85 and 0.94 times the standard deviation of annual water height amplitude (Table 7).This is comparable to the study by Schneider et al (2017), in which they obtained an average RMSE of 0.83 m for the Brahmaputra after calibrating the river cross sections in a hydrodynamic model against Envisat virtual stations. Figure 10 shows the water height fluctuations at two of the virtual stations.…”
Section: River Stagesupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Due to its long repeat period, CryoSat-2 samples more often during certain seasons over different parts of the river. Schneider et al (2017) obtained an RMSD of 2.5 m between simulated water heights and CryoSat-2 observations over the Brahmaputra -thus, we deem the obtained results satisfactory in light of the available information.…”
Section: River Stagementioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations