2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of curvelet denoising to 2D and 3D seismic data — Practical considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it might be more efficient to directly filter monochromatic data in the shot-receiver plane for frequency-domain FWI [e.g., Adamczyk et al, 2015], the 1 km spacing between OBSs in our case prevents the use of this approach. Instead, we apply the DCT in the time domain following the strategy presented by Górszczyk et al [2014]. In the final stage, we apply spiking deconvolution to whiten the amplitude spectrum and eliminate bubble effects.…”
Section: Figures 2a and 2cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it might be more efficient to directly filter monochromatic data in the shot-receiver plane for frequency-domain FWI [e.g., Adamczyk et al, 2015], the 1 km spacing between OBSs in our case prevents the use of this approach. Instead, we apply the DCT in the time domain following the strategy presented by Górszczyk et al [2014]. In the final stage, we apply spiking deconvolution to whiten the amplitude spectrum and eliminate bubble effects.…”
Section: Figures 2a and 2cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Curvelet (Hennenfent and Herrmann ; Neelamani et al . ; Ma and Plonka ; Górszczyk, Adamczyk and Malinowski ; Cao, Zhao and Hu ), wavelet (Du and Lines ), shearlet (Merouane Yilmaz and Baysal ), bandelet transform (Wang et al . ) and Radon transform (Sacchi and Porsani ; Sabbione, Sacchi and Velis ) are helpful in seismic data representation and random noise attenuation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of this method is based on the type of transform we select. Curvelet (Hennenfent and Herrmann 2006;Neelamani et al 2008;Ma and Plonka 2010;Górszczyk, Adamczyk and Malinowski 2014;Cao, Zhao and Hu 2015), wavelet (Du and Lines 2000), shearlet (Merouane Yilmaz and Baysal 2015), bandelet transform and Radon transform (Sacchi and Porsani 1999;Sabbione, Sacchi and Velis 2015) are helpful in seismic data representation and random noise attenuation. Curvelet and shearlet are the two multi-scale geometric transforms that can transfer seismic data to an enhanced sparse domain where the data can be easily manipulated mathematically (Lari and Gholami 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, multi-resolution analysis in the transform domain has opened up new methods for seismic data denoising (Shucong et al 2014;Mei et al 2012;Andrzej et al 2014;Chengming et al 2014). The multi-scale wavelet transform has been widely used in seismic processing (Rongfeng et al 2003;Shucong et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These shortcomings result in serious distortion, especially around peaks and troughs in the signal (Chengming et al 2014;Ivan et al 2005). More recently, some new methods based on sparse representation have been developed, including Ridgelets (Mei et al 2012), Contourlets (Yang et al 2009), Curvlets (Andrzej et al 2014) and Shearlets (Chengming et al 2014). These offer a promising framework for seismic data denoising, although the non-subsampled property of the Curvlets and Shearlets algorithms increases their time complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%