2003
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0765.2003.02607.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) to the analysis of microbial communities of subgingival plaque

Abstract: Although the DGGE method may have a lower sensitivity than the ordinary PCR methods, it could visualize the bacterial qualitative compositions and reveal the major species of the plaque. The DGGE analysis and following sequencing may have the potential to be a promising bacterial examination procedure in periodontal diseases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of PCR and DGGE combined with GC-rich primers at the 5′ end has been shown to identify almost all of the sequence variations in a sample [20] .This method allows direct identification and relative abundance of the bacterial species present in a sample, without the risks of inability to directly culture by conventional methods only [18]. Some deficiencies of DGGE are that multiple species may be present in one band when examining complex microbial communities [21], but PCR amplification and identification were undertaken of the samples taken at each stage in the construction process to enable identification of the species present. These were found not to be salivary in origin, which corroborates the DGGE profiles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of PCR and DGGE combined with GC-rich primers at the 5′ end has been shown to identify almost all of the sequence variations in a sample [20] .This method allows direct identification and relative abundance of the bacterial species present in a sample, without the risks of inability to directly culture by conventional methods only [18]. Some deficiencies of DGGE are that multiple species may be present in one band when examining complex microbial communities [21], but PCR amplification and identification were undertaken of the samples taken at each stage in the construction process to enable identification of the species present. These were found not to be salivary in origin, which corroborates the DGGE profiles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overestimation can also be a problem when using PCR-amplified 16S rDNA due to the possibility of heterogeneity of the 16S rDNA amplicons. This is reduced using specific touchdown protocols as employed in this study, which reduces spurious amplification during PCR [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern molecular techniques, particularly those based on amplifying 16S rRNA genes, include cloning and sequencing, quantitative DNA-DNA hybridization (checkerboard), denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), and real-time PCR. These methods have superseded conventional culture-based methods for quantifying the microbiota of healthy and diseased oral cavity (9,12,13,28). But to date, the implementation of these molecular techniques is still restricted to central laboratories because of the high equipment cost and the requirement for highly trained personnel.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A limitation of DGGE is that sequence differences greater than 1 base pair may fail to separate on a denaturing gel because of similarities in nucleotide proportions that result in identical denaturing characteristics of 2 different sequences. 12 Therefore, excision and sequencing is necessary to confirm the identification of species present within an individual band.…”
Section: S Rrna Gene Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%