1958
DOI: 10.1044/jshr.0103.257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Descriptive Linguistics to Child Language

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1963
1963
1979
1979

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only recently have there been gains in the assessment of language behavior (Berko, 1958;Ervin, 1964;Spradlin, 1963Spradlin, , 1967. There are a few extant studies of the development of syntax and morphology; but these have been merely diary reports about single children (Velten, 1943;Leopold, 1953;Albright and Albright, 1958), or simple correlations of children's language with their age and sex (Berko, 1958;Ervin, 1964). There have been very few experimental attempts to analyze language development functionally (Risley, 1966;Bricker, 1967;Lovaas, 1967).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only recently have there been gains in the assessment of language behavior (Berko, 1958;Ervin, 1964;Spradlin, 1963Spradlin, , 1967. There are a few extant studies of the development of syntax and morphology; but these have been merely diary reports about single children (Velten, 1943;Leopold, 1953;Albright and Albright, 1958), or simple correlations of children's language with their age and sex (Berko, 1958;Ervin, 1964). There have been very few experimental attempts to analyze language development functionally (Risley, 1966;Bricker, 1967;Lovaas, 1967).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most early studies of developmental linguistics have been descriptive or normative (e.g., Velten, 1943;Leopold, 1953;Albright and Albright, 1958;Berko, 1958;Ervin, 1964). However, a study by Guess, Sailor, Rutherford, and Baer (1968) has provided a starting point for the experimental analysis of generative morphological development by analyzing the productive use of the plural morpheme.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some children use omissions as a contrastive device. To support this notion Albright and Albright (1958) have reported that the regular absence of a sound may be as important to a sound system as the regular presence of a sound. They cite an example of a 26 month old child who omitted /I/ following IUI and / o I and replaced /I/ by lol following I c I and I tl.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%