2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00366-016-0458-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of direct meshless local Petrov–Galerkin (DMLPG) method for some Turing-type models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meshless methods can be broadly separated into two groups, namely, meshless methods based on strong form such as Kansa's-radial basis function (RBF) and collocation methods (Dehghan and Shokri, 2007;Hu et al, 2005;Jankowska et al, 2018;Kansa, 1990;Hussain and Haq, 2020;Lin et al, 2017;Singh et al, 2019;Xiong et al, 2018), smoothed particle hydrodynamics method (Liu et al, 2004) and finite point collocation method (Onate et al, 1996) and meshless methods based on weak form such as element-free Galerkin method (Belytschko et al, 1994), direct meshless local Petrov-Galerkin method (Ilati and Dehghan, 2017) and local radial point interpolation (MLRPI) method (Shivanian and Jafarabadi, 2018;Shivanian, 2015;Shivanian, 2016). In the methods of first group, by using collocation approach, governing equations and boundary conditions are discretized at the set of scattered nodes to get an algebraic system of equations.…”
Section: A Brief Review Of Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meshless methods can be broadly separated into two groups, namely, meshless methods based on strong form such as Kansa's-radial basis function (RBF) and collocation methods (Dehghan and Shokri, 2007;Hu et al, 2005;Jankowska et al, 2018;Kansa, 1990;Hussain and Haq, 2020;Lin et al, 2017;Singh et al, 2019;Xiong et al, 2018), smoothed particle hydrodynamics method (Liu et al, 2004) and finite point collocation method (Onate et al, 1996) and meshless methods based on weak form such as element-free Galerkin method (Belytschko et al, 1994), direct meshless local Petrov-Galerkin method (Ilati and Dehghan, 2017) and local radial point interpolation (MLRPI) method (Shivanian and Jafarabadi, 2018;Shivanian, 2015;Shivanian, 2016). In the methods of first group, by using collocation approach, governing equations and boundary conditions are discretized at the set of scattered nodes to get an algebraic system of equations.…”
Section: A Brief Review Of Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fu et al [331] proposed a domain-type meshless collocation method, called method of approximate particular solutions (MAPS), for numerical investigation on the effect of tumor on the thermal behavior inside the skin tissue. The Galerkin-based meshfree method has also been employed by the authors in [332,333] for numerical simulation of reaction-diffusion systems in developmental biology, which is one of the emerging areas of interest in computational biomechanics.…”
Section: Other Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meshless methods can be generally divided into two groups, one group is based on strong form such as Kansa's radial basis function (RBF) and collocation methods [21, 22, 28, 29, 31, 36, 38, 40–42, 53, 54, 63, 73], smoothing particle hydrodynmaics method [43], finite point collocation method [52], and so on and the other one is based on weak form such as element‐free Galerkin method [7], direct meshless local Petrov–Galerkin (DMLPG) method [33], local radial point interpolation (MLRPI) method [34, 60–62]. There are also meshless methods which use both weak and strong forms such as [18, 20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%