Application of Doppler Radar for Wildlife Detection in Vegetation

Shapoval, Vadym; Lev, Jakub; Bartoška, Jan; Kumhála, F.

doi:10.2478/sab-2018-0019

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Conducting system testing under bad weather was successful. Doppler radar is used again in the detection of animals and humans under vegetation cover in 2018 [ 22 ]. The Doppler radar has an HB100 sensor used in transmitting and receiving microwave radiation.…”

Section: Rqn2: What Adss Are Deployed To Mitigate Wvcs In the Primary...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Because of these limitations, other solutions such as wildlife–vehicle detection systems have received much attention. These include systems such as break-the-beam [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ], area cover [ 17 , 18 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ], buried cable [ 28 , 29 , 30 ], driver assistance [ 31 ], autonomous vehicles [ 32 ], and mobile mapping animal detection systems (ADSs) [ 33 , 34 ], as well as roadkill detection [ 35 ]. These ADSs are combined with traditional methods to enhance the prediction and detection of animals on the road.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Intelligent Systems Using Sensors and/or Machine Learning to Mitigate Wildlife–Vehicle Collisions: A Review, Challenges, and New Perspectives

Nandutu

Atemkeng

Okouma

2022

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Worldwide, the persistent trend of human and animal life losses, as well as damage to properties due to wildlife–vehicle collisions (WVCs) remains a significant source of concerns for a broad range of stakeholders. To mitigate their occurrences and impact, many approaches are being adopted, with varying successes. Because of their increased versatility and increasing efficiency, Artificial Intelligence-based methods have been experiencing a significant level of adoption. The present work extensively reviews the literature on intelligent systems incorporating sensor technologies and/or machine learning methods to mitigate WVCs. Included in our review is an investigation of key factors contributing to human–wildlife conflicts, as well as a discussion of dominant state-of-the-art datasets used in the mitigation of WVCs. Our study combines a systematic review with bibliometric analysis. We find that most animal detection systems (excluding autonomous vehicles) are relying neither on state-of-the-art datasets nor on recent breakthrough machine learning approaches. We, therefore, argue that the use of the latest datasets and machine learning techniques will minimize false detection and improve model performance. In addition, the present work covers a comprehensive list of associated challenges ranging from failure to detect hotspot areas to limitations in training datasets. Future research directions identified include the design and development of algorithms for real-time animal detection systems. The latter provides a rationale for the applicability of our proposed solutions, for which we designed a continuous product development lifecycle to determine their feasibility.

show abstract

Section: Rqn2: What Adss Are Deployed To Mitigate Wvcs In the Primary...mentioning

confidence: 99%