“…For the DPM application, the FDIp system uses the vertices H2:(0, 40), C2H6: (−38, 12.4), CH4: (−23.5, −32.4), C2H4: (23.5, −32.4) y C2H2: (38, 12.4) y represents the coordinates of each fault zone below [35]: -PD: (0, 24.5); (0, 33); (−1, 24.5); (−1, 33); -D1: (0, 40); (38, 12); (32, −6); (4, 16); (0, 1.5); -D2: (4, 16); (32, −6); (24, −30); (−1, −2); -T1: (−22.5, −32); (−6, −4); (−1, −2); (0, 1.5); (−35, 3); -T2: (1, −32); (−6, −4); (−22.5, −32); -T3: (24, −30); (−1, −2); (−6, −4); (1, −32); -S: (−35, 3); (0, 1.5); (0, 24.5); (0, 33); (-1, 24.5); -(−1, 33); (0, 40).This stage guarantees better results in fault identification than stages 1 and 2. With the Duval method in the FDIp, a higher level of reliability in the detection of failures is obtained, guaranteeing a more effective diagnosis in terms of the detection of incipient failures[36]. Although a greater identification of the failures is achieved at this stage, it has the drawback that it does not guarantee the Identification of DGA cases free of failures.…”