Twenty twenty is a year that few will forget-and hopefully not experience again! The COVID-19 pandemic continues to influence numerous aspects of our daily lives and is forcing us to rethink the way we do things. It is taking a huge toll on the public health of nations with various restrictions and periodic lockdowns negatively affecting economic activity and the mental health of citizens. We might, therefore, ask how the pandemic is affecting Proceedings B? Scientific publishing depends on original research conducted at universities and in diverse settings, from hospitals to field stations. Not surprisingly, these have been negatively influenced by the pandemic. Beginning last March-April, the activities of many thousands of biologists worldwide were dramatically changed by restrictions on fieldwork, the closure of university laboratories, research institutes and museums, and also the cancellation of scientific meetings and workshops. In-person lectures at universities were halted as faculties scrambled to transfer their courses online, thus diverting huge amounts of time away from research. Throw into the mix home daycare and schooling, technical glitches with video-conferencing and the impending winter months, and it is not surprising that many are frustrated and feeling COVID-19 fatigue. At the time of writing this editorial, these disruptions show no signs of abating and most of us look forward with guarded optimism to a time in 2021 when things will return to what is likely to be a 'new normal', although what shape that will take is not easy to predict.Despite the negative consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, every two weeks, Proceedings B has continued to publish exciting new research in organismal biology and our activities are surviving largely unscathed. This was despite the fact that our editorial staff were dispersed to their homes last Spring because of the need to vacate their editorial office at 6 Carlton House Terrace in London. Sincere thanks are due to the dedication of our authors, reviewers, editors and staff who have worked hard to 'keep calm and carry on' despite the relentless stream of bad news from the nightly broadcasts. We have allowed extra time for peer review this year and our reviewer invitation e-mail asks referees to get in touch if they require more time. We have also allowed authors and editorial board members extensions throughout the year as many have struggled with meeting our tight deadlines. I am pleased to report that notwithstanding all the problems and delays created by the pandemic, our publication metrics for 2020, detailed below, indicate that we have actually experienced an increase in submissions over 2019. Perhaps less time in the laboratory and field has encouraged some to clear their desks and get earlier work written up? We have also been able to shave a few days off our time from submission to final acceptance of papers compared with last year.From 1 January to 31 October 2020, we received 2615 submissions, an increase of 171 articles (7%) in comparison with ...