2017
DOI: 10.5603/aa.2016.0012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of endovenous mechanochemical ablation (MOCA) with Flebogrif™ to treat varicose veins of the lower extremities: a single center experience over 3 months of observation

Abstract: Introduction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
11
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…z o.o. seems to be an interesting proposal, extending the possibilities of effective solution of the problem of GSV/SSV insufficiency, perfectly matching the definition of the minimally invasive procedure [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…z o.o. seems to be an interesting proposal, extending the possibilities of effective solution of the problem of GSV/SSV insufficiency, perfectly matching the definition of the minimally invasive procedure [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Due to its low invasiveness, it can certainly be classified as a minimally invasive procedure. This position is supported by the opinion of patients undergoing the Flebogrif treatment, as well as physicians -Phlebologists performing the surgery [6,8]. This is certainly not the final solution to the problem of venous insufficiency, but it should be stated that it broadens the possibilities of the treatment and is an interesting option especially in the context of the results obtained during the two-year observation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When performing operations on a small diameter vein (<4mm) the risk of vessel perforation in the Flebogrif system appears to be minimal. The system also allows effective operation on veins with a diameter exceeding 20mm, our results reached 92 % after 3 months of follow-up [13] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Although 15 of 200 patients experienced recanalization, some of them did not require reintervention-partial recanalization, whereas remaining 10 cases had their vein successfully closed with a second procedure. The low number of complications and a cosmetic effect widely accepted by patients allowed us to add this method to the list of minimally-invasive procedures and should be seriously considered by medical professionals treating superficial vein insufficiencies [14,19,20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%