2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of false discovery rate procedure to pairwise comparisons of refractive index of glass fragments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lung microarray data were first analyzed for genes that could differentiate patients with SSc‐related ILD from healthy controls. The most informative genes were defined as those with a false discovery rate (FDR) of <0.05 () (13,732 genes in total). Genes were hierarchically clustered for both samples and genes using complete linkage and unsupervised clustering.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lung microarray data were first analyzed for genes that could differentiate patients with SSc‐related ILD from healthy controls. The most informative genes were defined as those with a false discovery rate (FDR) of <0.05 () (13,732 genes in total). Genes were hierarchically clustered for both samples and genes using complete linkage and unsupervised clustering.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genes with an FDR of <0.05 () (13,732 genes in total) were further analyzed using Pearson's correlation, comparing lung gene expression from the microarray data with the corresponding change in FibMax for each SSc patient with NSIP. We preselected genes with at least 2‐fold greater induction in SSc patients with NSIP than in healthy controls, both to focus the analysis on genes showing relatively large changes in expression and to minimize the chance of false‐positive or nonspecific results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QuasiTel uses a quasi-likelihood method based on Poisson distribution—commonly used for count data (41)—and applies a regression model to compare spectral count data. This statistical model was used to perform pair-wise comparisons between two treatment conditions (six replicates/condition), which generated a single combined inventory of protein identifications (comparison data set); the model also uses F-tests to compute p values and the FDR method to correct for multiple hypothesis comparisons of identified proteins (42). Thresholds were set for p values (≤0.20), total spectral counts (11), and spectral count log 2 rate ratios (fold changes ≥ 2) generated by this model and were used as criteria to filter comparison data sets.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genes were ranked by log fold change, and a nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to determine whether the genes annotated to a given GO category (or given pathway) and which show more differential expression than would be expected by chance alone. P-values were adjusted using the BenjaminiHochberg false discovery rate (Pawluk-Kolc et al 2006). …”
Section: Microarray and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%