2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60327-317-6_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Techniques to Establish Ligand–Receptor Orientation

Abstract: Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) has been utilized to determine distances between a fluorescence donor and a fluorescence acceptor having appropriately overlapping spectra. In this chapter, we utilize this approach to establish distances between a fluorescence donor situated in a distinct position within a docked ligand and a fluorescence acceptor situated in a distinct position within its receptor. This technique is applicable to receptor expressed in the environment of an intact cell containing … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar observation was made for the secretin receptor, for which it was also possible to obtain structural constraints that allowed modeling of ligand/receptor interactions within the extracellular region of the receptor (Harikumar et al, 2007). A detailed protocol about how to perform such studies was published and should enable other groups to use this approach (Harikumar and Miller, 2009). Although the studies mentioned so far were performed as steady-state measurements, our own group used a tetramethylrhodamine-labeled PTH and a PTH receptor, which was N-terminally tagged with GFP, to study dynamic receptor-ligand interaction with FRET in real time ( Fig.…”
Section: Adjobo-hermans Et Al 2006mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar observation was made for the secretin receptor, for which it was also possible to obtain structural constraints that allowed modeling of ligand/receptor interactions within the extracellular region of the receptor (Harikumar et al, 2007). A detailed protocol about how to perform such studies was published and should enable other groups to use this approach (Harikumar and Miller, 2009). Although the studies mentioned so far were performed as steady-state measurements, our own group used a tetramethylrhodamine-labeled PTH and a PTH receptor, which was N-terminally tagged with GFP, to study dynamic receptor-ligand interaction with FRET in real time ( Fig.…”
Section: Adjobo-hermans Et Al 2006mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 μM of Alexa Fluor 488 5‐SDP Ester labeled tau (Alexa488‐tau) was phase‐separated in the presence of 14% w/v PEG‐10000 in 10 mM HEPES pH 7.4, with 1 mM DTT, 10 mM NaCl in the presence or absence of 240 μM CaCl 2 , at 37°C. Experiments were also performed in the presence or absence of Alexa Fluor 568 NHS Ester labeled S100B (Alexa568‐S100B); this fluorophore has spectral overlay with Alexa488‐tau and is therefore amenable to FRET studies (Harikumar & Miller, 2009) ( n = 3–5 fields per sample). 20 μl samples were deposited in a μ‐Slide 18 Well—Flat (Cat.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%