2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of full scan gas chromatography high resolution mass spectrometry data to quantify targeted-pesticide residues and to screen for additional substances of concern in fresh-food commodities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this problem can be overcome by selecting characteristic ion fragments with lower abundance or sample dilution, which necessitate a second analysis. Vargas-Pérez and co-workers [35] proposed an application combining targeted and non-targeted approaches, using GC-Q-Orbitrap, for the multi-residue analysis of multiple pesticides in fruits and vegetables. The targeted method was successfully validated for 191 pesticides.…”
Section: Analysis Of Pesticidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this problem can be overcome by selecting characteristic ion fragments with lower abundance or sample dilution, which necessitate a second analysis. Vargas-Pérez and co-workers [35] proposed an application combining targeted and non-targeted approaches, using GC-Q-Orbitrap, for the multi-residue analysis of multiple pesticides in fruits and vegetables. The targeted method was successfully validated for 191 pesticides.…”
Section: Analysis Of Pesticidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent literature review shows that gas chromatography coupled to single or tandem mass spectrometric approaches (GC-MS, GC-MS/MS) served as an efficient tool for the determination of various organic compounds in food samples (Table 2). GC was used to quantify: 200 multiclass pesticides in fruits [67]; 14 lipophilic pesticides in raw propolis [68]; 5 organophosphorus pesticides (OPPs) in fruit juice and water [69], endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) i.e., alkylphenols; 4 phenylphenols, bisphenol A; 7 parabens; 11 OPPs and triclosan in different cereal-based foodstuffs [70]; 4 isomers of hexachlorocyclohexane; 6 pyrethroid pesticides i.e., bifenthrin, fenpropathrin, cyhalothrin, cyfluthrin, cypermethrin, deltamethrin in milk [71]; 133 multiclass pesticides in pericarpium citri reticulatae (chenpi) [72]; 5 NSAIDs i.e., ibuprofen, paracetamol, diclofenac, naproxen, ketoprofen; 3 natural estrogens i.e., estrone, 17β-estradiol, estriol in Mussels Mytilus edulis trossulus [73], glyoxal and methylglyoxal in different alcoholic beverage and fermented foods [74], essential fatty acids in cereals and green vegetables [75], and fatty acids in grilled pork [76]. Crude fat, total saturated acids, and total trans fatty acids in home meal replacements, and restaurant foods were analyzed using GC-FID (gas chromatography-flame ionization detector).…”
Section: Gas Chromatography Gc In Analysis Of Selected Bioactive Compounds In Food Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such differences do not prevent the observation of a high match for pesticide mass spectra, thus providing high confidence in compound identification (Figure 5). For example, non-targeted analysis of different food commodities-such as mushrooms and peppers, among others-by GC-EI-Q-Orbitrap-MS, along with further comparison of data against libraries containing more than 200,000 spectra, allowed the detection of several pesticides (i.e., lambda-cyhalothrin, triadimenol, imazalil, pyrimethanil, and tebuconazol as the most common compounds) without any prior hypothesis [169].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%