2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Fuzzy Logic in Job Satisfaction Performance Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the data collection procedures adopted, we addressed the possible threat of common method bias. Following Conway and Lance (2010), we argue that:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering the data collection procedures adopted, we addressed the possible threat of common method bias. Following Conway and Lance (2010), we argue that:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Job satisfaction results from the work performed and the organizational environment (Sabbagha et al, 2018). It can be influenced by the treatment received by superiors (Eyupoglu et al, 2016). Satisfied employees perform tasks that meet their expectations and values and are more productive and committed (Wen et al, 2019).…”
Section: Job Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meski perbandingan ini tidak apple to apple karena memiliki perbedaan dalam metodologi penghitungan, namun dapat menjadi gambaran bahwa metode TOPSIS menghasilkan nilai yang seirama dengan indikator serupa dan tidak ekstrim. Salah satu persamaan adalah daerah kota (71-77) memiliki nilai lebih tinggi dibanding daerah kabupaten (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12).…”
Section: Perbandingan Dengan Indikator Serupaunclassified