2020
DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2020.1826027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of fuzzy TOPSIS method for risk evaluation in development and implementation of solar park in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the review of the various assessment approaches for supply chain [13,14,16,59], fuzzy logic approach was highly preferred by researchers owing to its capability to incorporate and deal with problems involving impreciseness and vagueness phenomena. From literature, it is evident that researches adopted fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods in numerous sectors; for example: to assess sustainability of small urban neighbourhoods [60] and resilience of urban communities [61]; to locate supply chain logistic centres [62]; analysing safety hazards and occupational risks [63]; ranking alternative construction project plans [64] and renewable energy parks [65]; selection of material in the design and fabrication process [66]. The disadvantages of other approaches as that they are inflexible and must be restructured to appropriate the prevailing new circumstances as they involve several levels of linguistic terms or different membership functions usage.…”
Section: Models Focused Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the review of the various assessment approaches for supply chain [13,14,16,59], fuzzy logic approach was highly preferred by researchers owing to its capability to incorporate and deal with problems involving impreciseness and vagueness phenomena. From literature, it is evident that researches adopted fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods in numerous sectors; for example: to assess sustainability of small urban neighbourhoods [60] and resilience of urban communities [61]; to locate supply chain logistic centres [62]; analysing safety hazards and occupational risks [63]; ranking alternative construction project plans [64] and renewable energy parks [65]; selection of material in the design and fabrication process [66]. The disadvantages of other approaches as that they are inflexible and must be restructured to appropriate the prevailing new circumstances as they involve several levels of linguistic terms or different membership functions usage.…”
Section: Models Focused Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the project managers and contractors need to adopt their existing Risk Action Plans with necessary updates and revisions as required. The risk management techniques should include all critical members involved in the project at different phases (Ranganath et al, 2020). Further, risk management techniques should provide more accurate and decisive making outcome to help management mitigate or reduce the severity of risks through inclusion or exclusion of alternative solutions based on hard cut-offs.…”
Section: Managing Projects and Construction Risks During The Coronavirus Pandemicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Y. Xu & Li [21]developed a model of fuzzy hierarchical analysis process to assess risks in fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Ranganath, Sarkar, Patel, & Patel [22] Proposed a risk assessment method based on the fuzzy approach so as to adapt to the uncertainties and mentalities arising from the construction process. Also, a risk assessment model has recently been developed by Zhao, Hwang, & Gao [23], using the fuzzy hybrid assessment approach to investigate risks in green projects in Singapore.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%