2017
DOI: 10.1080/09715010.2017.1378597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of genetic algorithm for the groundwater management of a coastal aquifer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At smaller aquifer scales, where the assumption of miscible freshwater and saltwater is needed, salinity constraints have been prescribed as salt concentration limits at control points, such as pumping wells or monitoring wells, which have required the use of variable density flow models that are more complex and computationally more expensive than sharp‐interface models (Christelis & Mantoglou, 2019). SWI constraints have also been applied indirectly on hydraulic head, by limiting, for example, seaward hydraulic gradients or the water table drawdown at given monitoring points (Karatzas & Dokou, 2015; Pramada et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2018). A third group of SWI constraints involves the economic aspects of management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At smaller aquifer scales, where the assumption of miscible freshwater and saltwater is needed, salinity constraints have been prescribed as salt concentration limits at control points, such as pumping wells or monitoring wells, which have required the use of variable density flow models that are more complex and computationally more expensive than sharp‐interface models (Christelis & Mantoglou, 2019). SWI constraints have also been applied indirectly on hydraulic head, by limiting, for example, seaward hydraulic gradients or the water table drawdown at given monitoring points (Karatzas & Dokou, 2015; Pramada et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2018). A third group of SWI constraints involves the economic aspects of management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors such as precipitation, evaporation, and artificial mining can be regarded as inputs to the system, and the groundwater level can be regarded as the output of the system [ 2 ]. At the same time, due to the spatial variation of the aqueous system, there will be data variability in the actual research process, and some precise research methods often fall into a variety of dilemmas when describing the nonlinear relationship of groundwater systems [ 3 ]. Numerical methods can describe irregularly shaped regions and aquifers with heterogeneity, anisotropy, and complex boundary conditions, can deal with river infiltration, atmospheric precipitation replenishment, changes in the temporal and spatial distribution of various pumping, drainage and evaporation, so as to solve complex problems that are not easy to solve by other calculation methods; however, the numerical method as a distributed parameter model has high requirements on the quantity and accuracy of the data [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%