2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2015.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of GIS-based data driven random forest and maximum entropy models for groundwater potential mapping: A case study at Mehran Region, Iran

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
211
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 479 publications
(221 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
6
211
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Several statistical methods can also be adopted for groundwater mapping where adequate information on different influencing parameters to groundwater accumulation and movement are available. These include frequency ratio (Davoodi et al 2013), multi-criteria decision evaluation (Murthy and Mamo 2009;Kumar et al 2014), logistic regression model (Ozdemir 2011), weights-of-evidence model (Ozdemir 2011;Pourtaghi and Pourghasemi 2014), random forest model (Rahmati et al 2016Naghibi et al 2016, maximum entropy model (Rahmati et al 2016), boosted regression tree (Naghibi et al 2016;Naghibi and Pourghasemi 2015), classification and regression tree (Naghibi et al 2016), multivariate adaptive regression spline model (Zabihi et al 2016), certainty factor model (Zabihi et al 2016), evidential belief function (Pourghasemi and Beheshtirad 2015;Naghibi and Pourghasemi 2015), and generalized linear model (Naghibi and Pourghasemi 2015). These information are lacking in many third world country hence proper understanding of hydrogeological characteristics for successful exploitation of groundwater in basement areas depend largely on geophysical methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several statistical methods can also be adopted for groundwater mapping where adequate information on different influencing parameters to groundwater accumulation and movement are available. These include frequency ratio (Davoodi et al 2013), multi-criteria decision evaluation (Murthy and Mamo 2009;Kumar et al 2014), logistic regression model (Ozdemir 2011), weights-of-evidence model (Ozdemir 2011;Pourtaghi and Pourghasemi 2014), random forest model (Rahmati et al 2016Naghibi et al 2016, maximum entropy model (Rahmati et al 2016), boosted regression tree (Naghibi et al 2016;Naghibi and Pourghasemi 2015), classification and regression tree (Naghibi et al 2016), multivariate adaptive regression spline model (Zabihi et al 2016), certainty factor model (Zabihi et al 2016), evidential belief function (Pourghasemi and Beheshtirad 2015;Naghibi and Pourghasemi 2015), and generalized linear model (Naghibi and Pourghasemi 2015). These information are lacking in many third world country hence proper understanding of hydrogeological characteristics for successful exploitation of groundwater in basement areas depend largely on geophysical methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geospatial information has proven useful to explore the link between water and poverty [18,19]. In the case of groundwater resources, GIS has frequently been applied to delineate groundwater potential areas [20][21][22][23][24], study the spatial distribution of aquifer recharge [25][26][27], or assess the vulnerability of aquifer systems to pollution [28][29][30].…”
Section: Methodological Precedents Research Objectives and Noveltiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This provides maximum entropy while avoiding assumptions on the unknown, hence the name of the classifier. MaxEnt was proposed to estimate geographic species distribution and potential habitat [56], to classify vegetation from remote sensing images [65], and groundwater potential mapping [66]. In our study, MaxEnt was applied with default parameter values in GEE as follows: weight for L1 regularization set to 0, weight for L2 regularization set to 0.00001, epsilon set to 0.00001, minimum number of iterations set to 0, and maximum number of iterations set to 100.…”
Section: Vegetation Index (Vi) Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%