1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0967-0661(97)84358-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of h∞ robust control to the RM12 jet engine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notation e the system output deviation e k + 1 (t) the output deviation k the number of iteration k i , k p the controller gain N iterative learning gain N H the speed of the compressor N L the speed of the fan P 3 the compressor outlet total pressure P 6 the connotation export total pressure T 5 the low pressure turbine outlet total temperature T 22 the fan outlet total temperature u the control vector of the system u k (t) last value of control variable u k + 1 (t) the current control variable W f the fuel supply of main chamber x the state vector of the system y the output vector of the system y d system desired signal y d (t) the desired trajectory y k (t) system output variable y n the output signal of system G i , G p iterative learning gain…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notation e the system output deviation e k + 1 (t) the output deviation k the number of iteration k i , k p the controller gain N iterative learning gain N H the speed of the compressor N L the speed of the fan P 3 the compressor outlet total pressure P 6 the connotation export total pressure T 5 the low pressure turbine outlet total temperature T 22 the fan outlet total temperature u the control vector of the system u k (t) last value of control variable u k + 1 (t) the current control variable W f the fuel supply of main chamber x the state vector of the system y the output vector of the system y d system desired signal y d (t) the desired trajectory y k (t) system output variable y n the output signal of system G i , G p iterative learning gain…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 To solve this problem, the common approach is splitting the flight envelop into different operating points; thus, the approximated linear models at each operating point are employed in aero-engine controller, such as finite impulse response model 2 or small perturbation state space model. [2][3][4] Consequently, traditional linear control methods, such as H ' optimal control, [5][6][7] linear quadratic regulator (LQR)/loop transfer recovery (LTR), 8 and proportional integral derivative (PID) control, are then utilized for each linear model. Finally, gain-scheduling method is employed to control aircraft engines over the full flight envelope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The H ∞ control theory attracts many researchers in robust control design, especially in the noise elimination by setting a disturbance rejection level from noises to outputs. The research works in this field are numerous [10][11][12][13]. The proportion integral derivative (PID) control method is practically applied to turbofan engines; while the three parameters, proportional, integral and differential, need to be adjusted at different operating conditions [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monitoring of gas turbines, and especially aircraft engines, is a widely studied topic in the gas turbine diagnosis literature (Volponi, 2014;Luppold et al, 1989;Doel, 2003). For control applications, model based feedback control strategies are studied in Watts et al (1992); Härefors (1997). In these papers, the control strategies are based on linear models which are derived from a thermodynamic engine model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%