2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2014.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of HF etching in a HRTEM study of supported MoS2 catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The connection between MgFe 2 O 4 and MoS 2 was very tight, and the unique structure would be advantageous to reduce the defects of the interface and increase the separation of the photogenerated charges. The MoS 2 nanosheet was further identified through HRTEM (Figure f), where the lattice fringes were 0.27 nm, corresponding to the MoS 2 (101) crystal face. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connection between MgFe 2 O 4 and MoS 2 was very tight, and the unique structure would be advantageous to reduce the defects of the interface and increase the separation of the photogenerated charges. The MoS 2 nanosheet was further identified through HRTEM (Figure f), where the lattice fringes were 0.27 nm, corresponding to the MoS 2 (101) crystal face. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the p-π conjugate effect, the organics intercalated into the MoS 2 layers and widen the layer spacing. The curved structure is caused by the formation of coordinated structure between the organics and the MoS 2 [36][37][38][39]. With increasing the synthesis temperature (170 -200 °C), the layers length for samples (Solvo-IV-2, Solvo-III-2, and Solvo-II-2) maintained around 6-7 nm and the average stacking number ranged from 1 to 1.4 respectively (Figure 6c, d).…”
Section: Characterization Of Intercalated and Multilayer Mos 2 Samplesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The orientation of MoS 2 slabs on alumina has also been debated for a long time and the question is still not entirely resolved. Model supports are essential for elucidating this issue because the porous structure of conventional γ‐Al 2 O 3 supports as well as the poor contrast in conventional TEM applied to powders (which limits the use of the latter techniques to the observation of MoS 2 slabs parallel to the electron beam) hampers a clear distinction between basal or edge bonded MoS 2 slabs.…”
Section: Contribution Of Model Planar Supports To the Description Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%