2016 Second International Conference on Computational Intelligence &Amp; Communication Technology (CICT) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/cict.2016.143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Hierarchical Clustering Algorithm to Evaluate Students Performance of an Institute

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the use of clustering methods, we built on earlier studies [7,22]. Though there exist many clustering methods, we used the MCM, which has also been extensively used in the literature [23,24]. The main advantages are that it relies on statistical models and requires no pre-specified number of clusters [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the use of clustering methods, we built on earlier studies [7,22]. Though there exist many clustering methods, we used the MCM, which has also been extensively used in the literature [23,24]. The main advantages are that it relies on statistical models and requires no pre-specified number of clusters [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Challenges faced by each method are generally stated in the advantages and disadvantages previous research. Predictive results using classification and cluster methods by previous researchers only predict students according to the predetermined class, not following the performance of the individuals involved [34], [35]. Many researchers could not distinguish between classification and cluster methods.…”
Section: Predictive Models Used In Previous Studies and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It relies on statistical models and requires no pre-specified number of clusters [24]. HCM has also been extensively used in the literature [25,26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%