2014
DOI: 10.3846/13923730.2013.801922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Importance-Satisfaction Analysis and Influence-Relations Map to Evaluate Design Delay Factors

Abstract: Design delays can negatively influence the total completion time of a facility construction project. Knowing the factors to which design delays are most sensitive supports the time management of designs. However, factors that cause design delays are several and interrelated. This study proposes a new model to identify key factors that drive design delays. The core of the model integrates importance-satisfaction analysis (ISA) and an influence-relations map (IRM). The ISA evaluates the performance of each delay… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After visualizing the complex causal relationships among factors using the IRM, Wang et al [25,26] further developed the net influence matrix = [Net ] × to evaluate the strength of influence of one factor on another, in which Net = − .…”
Section: Observations and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After visualizing the complex causal relationships among factors using the IRM, Wang et al [25,26] further developed the net influence matrix = [Net ] × to evaluate the strength of influence of one factor on another, in which Net = − .…”
Section: Observations and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, they proposed an evaluation laboratory technique, Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), to catch the causal relationships among factors and produce an influence-relationship map. Furthermore, Wang, Lin, Wang, Liu, and Lee [ 8 ] developed an Importance-Satisfaction Analysis (ISA) model to estimate the performance of each factor and an Influence-Relations Map (IRM) to catch the relationship among factors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the method has a certain curb that the risk paths in the design and the dynamic behaviour of the risk factors were not considered [18]. The different methods may have different contribution with certain limitations, especially for risk assessment [26]. In addition, the different studies in the different methods have still lacked a systematic approach to consider the complex and dynamic nature of construction projects risk for better understanding and effective risk management [27].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%