2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2010.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of in-situ measurement to determine 137Cs in the Swiss Alps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
5
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The proportion of the 137 Cs Chernobyl input at our study site was estimated to be at 50.2±10.0 %. In comparison to the average value of Chernobyl contribution in the Swiss Alps which was found to be between 75% (Meusburger et al, 2018) to 80% (Schaub et al, 2010;Alewell et al, 2014), the contribution found in our site was notably less.…”
Section: Change Of Physicochemical Properties Of Soils Due To Land-use Change and Soil Erosioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…The proportion of the 137 Cs Chernobyl input at our study site was estimated to be at 50.2±10.0 %. In comparison to the average value of Chernobyl contribution in the Swiss Alps which was found to be between 75% (Meusburger et al, 2018) to 80% (Schaub et al, 2010;Alewell et al, 2014), the contribution found in our site was notably less.…”
Section: Change Of Physicochemical Properties Of Soils Due To Land-use Change and Soil Erosioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…More than 90% of the 137 Cs inventory was concentrated in the top 10 cm of surface soil across the entire hillslope (Figure 4); this finding is consistent with previous reports that 137 Cs is concentrated at depths of less than 10 cm (Nakanishi et al, 2014;Takahashi et al, 2015Takahashi et al, , 2018. The estimated amount of 137 The larger 137 Cs inventory observed in downslope areas in this study (Figure 5) differed from the reported pattern of a higher air dose rate at higher elevation on a forested hillslope (Atarashi-Ando et al, 2015;Schaub et al, 2010). Previous studies have suggested that the differences in the spatial distribution pattern of air dose rate were mainly due to differences in initial deposition, and the initial level of 137 Cs deposition tends to increase with elevation, and that vegetation type affects the initial spatial distribution on the ground (Atarashi-Ando et al, 2015;Schaub et al, 2010).…”
Section: Observed 137 Cs Inventory On the Hillslopesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…3), indicating a predominant contribution 206 of soil radiocesium to the air dose rates at 1 m height (where the air dose rates were also 207 measured by the KURAMA-II). A few outliers can be found in Figure 3, which may be 208 due to high spatial variation in radiocesium deposition to the soil even over a small area 209 (Schaub et al, 2010). Another potential cause for the outliers is a larger contribution of 210 gamma rays from tree canopies at the measurement points.…”
Section: Topography 123mentioning
confidence: 99%