2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/5849019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Induced Polarization and Resistivity to the Determination of the Location of Metalliferous Veins in the Taroucht and Tabesbaste Areas (Eastern Anti-Atlas, Morocco)

Abstract: The study area is located in the extreme southwest of the Ougnat Mountains in the eastern Anti-Atlas, which is part of the distorted northern margin of the West African craton. It has Late Neoproterozoic to terminal, Paleozoic and Quaternary lands. In order to obtain a better recognition of the different structural contacts and to define the alignment of mineralized veins in barite and galena at the level of the study area, we used the technique of electrical tomography. The resulting response, in the form of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been recognized to be more suitable for hydrogeological exploration of sedimentary basin. Generally, the resistivity method reveals an important result during the detection of fractured zones and metalliferous veins (Dakir et al, 2019). The VLF-EM method is widely used for the detection of buried conductive targets, including aquiferous faulting systems (Ogilvy and Lee, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been recognized to be more suitable for hydrogeological exploration of sedimentary basin. Generally, the resistivity method reveals an important result during the detection of fractured zones and metalliferous veins (Dakir et al, 2019). The VLF-EM method is widely used for the detection of buried conductive targets, including aquiferous faulting systems (Ogilvy and Lee, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpretation [70] Pb-Zn deposit Sulphides (galena, sphalerite, pyrite and marcasite) [26] manganese deposits manganese deposits (pyrite, chalcopyrite),Fe oxides [71] Gold exploration Disseminated sulphides (pyrite, chalcopyrite),iron oxides [34] Water exploration Sand with heavy minerals [72] Detecting cracks in clay rocks 13% Pyrite in calcite rock [73] Detection of ore bodies [74] Metalliferrous veins exploration Presence of Barite and Galena [75] Plutonic rock mineral exploration Sulphure mineralizations [76] Plutonic rock mineral exploration Ore deposits [77] Galena exploration Pyrite, chalcopyrite, galena [35] Volcanic geothermal area Pyrite, iron oxides [78] Case study alluvial fans High clay content [47] Hydrocarbon contamination Clayey silt [34] Water exploration Weathered rock leaching clay minerals [79] Slope study Clay [72] Detecting cracks in clay rocks Clay rocks [80] Landfill characterization Clayey till [52] Mapping of lithotypes Clay till [81] Landfill characterization Waste, plastic and metal [82] Landfill characterization Waste, soil with leachate [80] Landfill characterization Waste and leachate [83] Landfill characterization Waste Figure 12a illustrates the difficulty of interpreting normalized chargeability data when no in-situ information is available. Except for the group Landfill that is well distinguished from the others and could possibly be discriminated based only on the normalized chargeability values, all the other groups are mixed together with values approximately in the range [0.01-1] mS/m.…”
Section: Reference Context Of Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 5: 2D Inversion model resistivity section of Gbede profile 4 Profile 5Electrical imaging provides us with more detailed information on the location of the mineralized zone(Dakir et al, 2019). The result of the resistivity model for profile 5 as presented in Figure6revealed the the presence of two mineralized layers among the four layers of the profile in Table2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%