2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12145-022-00797-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of machine-learning algorithms for tephrochronology: a case study of Plio-Quaternary volcanic fields in the South Aegean Active Volcanic Arc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…kNN displays more variable results in the literature. Good performances were observed in a study with Alaska tephras (Bolton et al, 2020) and kNN had the best performance in the Neapolitan region (Pignatelli & Piochi, 2021), yet it obtained relatively bad performances in the South Aegean Active Volcanic Arc (Uslular et al, 2022). Finally, LR displayed the worst performances considering both balanced and unbalanced accuracies, being lower than all other models outside of 1SD.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…kNN displays more variable results in the literature. Good performances were observed in a study with Alaska tephras (Bolton et al, 2020) and kNN had the best performance in the Neapolitan region (Pignatelli & Piochi, 2021), yet it obtained relatively bad performances in the South Aegean Active Volcanic Arc (Uslular et al, 2022). Finally, LR displayed the worst performances considering both balanced and unbalanced accuracies, being lower than all other models outside of 1SD.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In particular, RF is among the best performing algorithms in previous work assessing the use of machine learning for identifying the volcanic source of volcanic products, (Bolton et al, 2020;Pignatelli & Piochi, 2021;Uslular et al, 2022). In contrast, GB was tested exclusively in the South Aegean Active Volcanic Arc, with similar performances to that of RF (Uslular et al, 2022). kNN displays more variable results in the literature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tephra correlation is another field where ML classification methods found large applications (e.g., Petrelli et al, 2017;Bolton et al, 2020;Uslular et al, 2022). For example, Bolton et al (2020), suggested the use of machine learning classifiers on tephra correlation.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%