2020
DOI: 10.3390/s20175002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Machine Learning for the in-Field Correction of a PM2.5 Low-Cost Sensor Network

Abstract: Many low-cost sensors (LCSs) are distributed for air monitoring without any rigorous calibrations. This work applies machine learning with PM2.5 from Taiwan monitoring stations to conduct in-field corrections on a network of 39 PM2.5 LCSs from July 2017 to December 2018. Three candidate models were evaluated: Multiple linear regression (MLR), support vector regression (SVR), and random forest regression (RFR). The model-corrected PM2.5 levels were compared with those of GRIMM-calibrated PM2.5. RFR was superior… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis presented in [13] has shown that from different evaluated ML models, the random forest algorithm expresses the best performances, in most of the observed cases, while in some cases artificial neural networks (ANN) could improve the performance as well. In [14][15][16][17], various kinds of machine learning algorithms were proposed and evaluated for different air pollution monitoring scenarios. Due to aging, sensors gradually begin to lose their sensitivity or start to show a drift in their measurements.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis presented in [13] has shown that from different evaluated ML models, the random forest algorithm expresses the best performances, in most of the observed cases, while in some cases artificial neural networks (ANN) could improve the performance as well. In [14][15][16][17], various kinds of machine learning algorithms were proposed and evaluated for different air pollution monitoring scenarios. Due to aging, sensors gradually begin to lose their sensitivity or start to show a drift in their measurements.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value measured by the sensor is usually affected by external conditions, so the sensor requires a separate correction equation. In mathematical models, multiple regression models [ 40 ] that can consider surrounding environmental factors have been used to establish relevant correction formulas. According to the results, the mathematical model of multiple linear regression is given as follows: where is the measured average error of double sensors; and and are the horizontal distance and driving speed, respectively.…”
Section: Vehicle Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the results, the mathematical model of multiple linear regression is given as follows: The value measured by the sensor is usually affected by external conditions, so the sensor requires a separate correction equation. In mathematical models, multiple regression models [40] that can consider surrounding environmental factors have been used to establish relevant correction formulas. According to the results, the mathematical model of multiple linear regression is given as follows:…”
Section: Real Vehicle Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Airly is not sharing its calibration algorithms with the public (Airly, 2021b). However, the use of ML techniques for this purpose is well established and has been published in many papers (Zimmerman et al, 2018;Okafor et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2020), as well as discussed in the official World Health Organisation and World Meteorological Organization report (Peltier et al, 2021). It was also shown that during the COVID-19 pandemic spring the migration of air pollutions from solid fuels heating from surrounding municipalities to Krakow was the main source of PMs in the city as transportation was significantly reduced due to lockdown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%