2021
DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s330591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Bone Metastasis in Patients with Prostate Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Missing values were imputed by R mouse package using classification and regression tree principle ( 18 ). Meanwhile, to compare the importance of each feature, we extract the feature importance of each variable in the machine learning model according to the Permutation Importance principle ( 19 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Missing values were imputed by R mouse package using classification and regression tree principle ( 18 ). Meanwhile, to compare the importance of each feature, we extract the feature importance of each variable in the machine learning model according to the Permutation Importance principle ( 19 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical and comprehensive reviews of ML in medical diagnosis by Bhavsar et al ( 35 , 39 ) suggested that ML techniques can help medical professionals reduce diagnostic errors, improve healthcare services, and cut treatment costs. And in the cancer metastases field, some clinical prediction models in predicting the risk of BM based on ML algorithms have been developed to assist clinicians in personalizing patient diagnosis ( 40 , 41 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we applied the above algorithms to independent prognostic factors to build surviving models at the 3-year observation point. After testing the various performances of the above two types of models, we selected the most representative models as clinical recommendations (25,26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%