2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-009-2449-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of memetic algorithm in assembly sequence planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimum set of parameters found to be able to provide the optimal/near optimal assembly sequence in reasonable time is population size of 10, fraction of worst eggs that are thrown out 10%, probability used in generating new eggs to replace those that are thrown out 90%. After the CS algorithm is run using the above set of parameters, the optimal assembly sequence obtained is [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14] with fitness value of 1.5269, requiring 7 tool changes, 4 reorientation changes, stability index of 9, having the base component at the first location of the assembly sequence, and most importantly the sequence was found to have no feasibility (precedence) violations. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed CS algorithm, it is compared with Improved Harmony Search (IHS) algorithm [12].…”
Section: Results Of Proposed Cs Algorithm For Assembly Sequence Optimmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The optimum set of parameters found to be able to provide the optimal/near optimal assembly sequence in reasonable time is population size of 10, fraction of worst eggs that are thrown out 10%, probability used in generating new eggs to replace those that are thrown out 90%. After the CS algorithm is run using the above set of parameters, the optimal assembly sequence obtained is [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14] with fitness value of 1.5269, requiring 7 tool changes, 4 reorientation changes, stability index of 9, having the base component at the first location of the assembly sequence, and most importantly the sequence was found to have no feasibility (precedence) violations. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed CS algorithm, it is compared with Improved Harmony Search (IHS) algorithm [12].…”
Section: Results Of Proposed Cs Algorithm For Assembly Sequence Optimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed CS algorithm, it is compared with Improved Harmony Search (IHS) algorithm [12]. The best sequence generated by the IHS algorithm is found to be [ 6,11,12,13,14,7,8,9,10] with fitness value of 1.5077, requiring 7 tool changes, 5 reorientation changes, stability index of 9, having base component at the first location of the assembly sequence, no feasibility violations but is clearly sub-optimal when compared to the sequence generated by CS algorithm. Figure 8 shows comparison between the convergence graphs of the CS and IHS algorithms from which it can be concluded that the proposed CS algorithm clearly outperforms IHS in terms of convergence speed as it is able to reach the global best fitness value in lesser number of iterations.…”
Section: Results Of Proposed Cs Algorithm For Assembly Sequence Optimmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shan et al (2009) used genetic simulated annealing (GSA) algorithm and ant colony optimization (ACO) algorithm to solve the ASPO problem. Gao et al (2010) made a comparison among geometric reasoning approach, knowledge-based approach and heuristic method, and found the optimal assembly sequence by a memetic algorithm. Wang and Liu (2010) proposed a chaotic particle swarm optimization approach to plan and optimize the assembly sequence of complex products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, with the rapid development and wide application of digital and information technology [2,3], intelligent computing [4,5], virtual reality (VR) [6,7], and augmented reality (AR) technology [8], assembly planning can be efficiently carried out by these new methods. Many excellent assembly systems have been developed using the above techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%