2023
DOI: 10.1002/clc.24154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Application of Mendelian randomization in the discovery of risk factors for coronary heart disease from 2009 to 2023: A bibliometric review

Dayuan Zhong,
Hui Cheng

Abstract: Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a life‐threatening condition that poses a significant risk to individuals. Mendelian randomization (MR) is an emerging epidemiological research method that offers substantial advantages in identifying risk factors for diseases. Currently, there are ongoing CHD‐related MR studies. To gain comprehensive insights into the focal areas and trends of CHD‐related MR research, this study utilizes bibliometrics to conduct an in‐depth analysis of CHD‐related MR articles published in the c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MR has emerged as a powerful method to overcome these challenges, utilizing genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs) [ 9 ]. By leveraging genetic variants that influence exposures of interest, MR enables researchers to generate evidence that is less prone to the biases that frequently affect the reliability of the results of observational studies [ 10 ]. This approach not only enhances the validity of causal inferences drawn from epidemiological data but also provides new paths for identifying interventions that could yield substantial health benefits [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MR has emerged as a powerful method to overcome these challenges, utilizing genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs) [ 9 ]. By leveraging genetic variants that influence exposures of interest, MR enables researchers to generate evidence that is less prone to the biases that frequently affect the reliability of the results of observational studies [ 10 ]. This approach not only enhances the validity of causal inferences drawn from epidemiological data but also provides new paths for identifying interventions that could yield substantial health benefits [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%